Lisa loves Pooh said:Glad to say that our Catholic church does not support the televangelists.
It goes to various missions, to help the poor, the bishop's appeal et cetera.
We get statements annually about what they did and where all monies were allocated.
As far as your personal finances and what a church advises---you should just like retirement...work small and set the max as your goal. If 10% is going to blow you out of the water....well that isn't its purpose. Remember, I said you should "feel it" not be "hurt" by it. Giving is to feel good and not painful. (and I do not mean that it is painful to the stingy--I mean painful in that you would have trouble paying the bills of necessity).
If you think about it--the extras are just extras....I could justify saving for retirment perhaps--but paying the kids education (though important) and going on vacation....are just extras. They aren't needs.
Tithing is always a "before"--not a do it with what's leftover thing. Kind of like savings. IF you don't put that $50 in the bank now. Who's to say that after expenses...you'll still have $50 remaining to save.
It is all about Trust....and the great thing is that it is a ratio. 10% of someone who makes $100 a week is only $10. Now to some that would be alot...but that person is making $5200 and I am assuming that they are not poverty stricken. But if that $10 was instead going to be used to go to the movies...let's be honest...that person has just said that personal entertainment is more important than God.
I find it interesting that you are Catholic Lisa....I've never personally heard a big push to tithe back when I did attend church regularly (many years ago). Most of my family is catholic, including my DH's parents who are very devout Catholics, and yet I know for a fact that they don't tithe 10%. Interestingly enough, their church in NJ just went through a big scandal with their priest. He embezzled over a million dollars from his congregation...he's currently awaiting trail.
Everyone has their priorities I guess. We have no children, but if we did I'm 110% positive that we'd fund their college educations before giving to charity. I don't see a college education as a "need", I see it as an absolute necessity in our times. It's sort of like a previous poster who said something about us not having to save for retirement 500 years ago. Of course you didn't save for retirement 500 years ago....your life expectancy was about 40....LOL. That just makes no sense at all to me.
In fact, we are helping to put a nephew through college because we have the means, and we'd hate to see him burdened with tens of thousands in loans as he begins his professional life.
So if you don't fund your childrens' college education and they end up having to take out government subsidized loans and/or government grants which are all funded by the American taxpayer, isn't that then sort of silly when you could have provided for them yourself had you not given 10% of your income to your church. I'm saying, why not allocate your funds differently. Give charitably to your own before giving it to the church. Do you know what I mean?


DH is also Catholic and attended Catholic school. It would make me feel very uncomfortable if a priest or pastor or someone like that asked for 10% of our income and then specified that the amount was to be BEFORE taxes. It would make me think that all they cared about was my money. 
Just out of curiosity!!!

). We are sooo feeling the pinch right now in terms of space.