One of the biggest financial risks of
DVC ownership is the increasing disparity between the purchase price (whether through DVC or resale) and the underlying rental rate. Since I began evaluating DVC many years ago, the rental rates have remained relatively flat while the purchase price has consistently climbed. In the end analysis, since this program is essentially a right to use DVC properties, eventually, the rental rate becomes the most significant element of each potential purchaser's consideration (at least an informed purchaser). It is my contention that even Disney's ROFR, which effectively mitigates the impact of free market pricing, will eventually be insufficient to support the elevated pricing without a related increase in rental rates. With all due respect to those who fundamentally object to the rental alternative, this is a pretty nonsensical approach. After all, comparing home ownership versus renting an apartment is not the question here--in the world of DVC, the apartment tenant gets identical accommodations as the DVC "owner".
We remain generally positive about our purchase made 2 years ago. That said, our concern about relative value continues to grow, due in large part, to the "rent versus buy" equation.