I consider myself an "informed purchaser", and I'm quite capable of doing some basic analysis (let me blow the dust off of my MBACGregoryJr said:One of the biggest financial risks of DVC ownership is the increasing disparity between the purchase price (whether through DVC or resale) and the underlying rental rate. Since I began evaluating DVC many years ago, the rental rates have remained relatively flat while the purchase price has consistently climbed. In the end analysis, since this program is essentially a right to use DVC properties, eventually, the rental rate becomes the most significant element of each potential purchaser's consideration (at least an informed purchaser). [...] .
I can't say that I agree with you here, but I was wondering what you are using for "underlying rental rates"?CGregoryJr said:One of the biggest financial risks of DVC ownership is the increasing disparity between the purchase price (whether through DVC or resale) and the underlying rental rate. Since I began evaluating DVC many years ago, the rental rates have remained relatively flat while the purchase price has consistently climbed. In the end analysis, since this program is essentially a right to use DVC properties, eventually, the rental rate becomes the most significant element of each potential purchaser's consideration (at least an informed purchaser). It is my contention that even Disney's ROFR, which effectively mitigates the impact of free market pricing, will eventually be insufficient to support the elevated pricing without a related increase in rental rates. With all due respect to those who fundamentally object to the rental alternative, this is a pretty nonsensical approach. After all, comparing home ownership versus renting an apartment is not the question here--in the world of DVC, the apartment tenant gets identical accommodations as the DVC "owner".
We remain generally positive about our purchase made 2 years ago. That said, our concern about relative value continues to grow, due in large part, to the "rent versus buy" equation.
LIFERBABE said:I agree!
Going to Dallas and staying at a fancy Hotel for the weekend just isnt the same.
We purchased DVC instead of a Vacation Home or RV for many of the reasons Beca stated. No maintenance work, the resorts are Destinations, etc. If we grow tired of the parks, we will still have top notch accomodations.
What would prompt me to sell is if the resorts are not maintained properly, not the parks. I would just stop spending money on the parks if they decline, but I could still see us visiting BCV and SSR as destinations.
Cyndy said: I also agree with many points made, especially the DVC as a destination resort. We're empty nesters who have used DVC both for the parks and simply to vacation without doing parks. What a fantastic option. I recall a few years ago Vegas did that "family" destination campaign, now really!! Maybe we can't gamble at WDW (fine with me) we can take our GK and be sure that they will be delighted. We can also book HHI and Vero for a beach fix, so when we were comparing DVC to other resorts, none could offer the inside WDW which is what tipped the scale for our buying. So far I have yet to see any TS that can guarantee WDW reservations for any time I choose
colleen costello said:I live in the Midwest and Orlando offers me spring break in a beautiful community. Dreaming of the flowers and sunshine literally keeps me going in January and February. I used to struggle with seasonal depression after Christmas was over. Now I spend those 8 weeks planning our spring break and it has been the best medicine...