pigletgirl
Mama to 4 Disney loving kids!
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2006
- Messages
- 15,404
I hope she is never eligible for parole. I'm afraid of what she might do.
So now what happens?
For what ever reason they are saying this is a verdict.I thought it would be hung until they said there was a verdict. This is not a verdict.
I'm sitting over here shedding a few tears for the Alexander family. Its so gut wrenchingly painful to hear their cries. My heart is breaking over here.
The Kansas City bomber, the brutal killers of Dr. Pettit's entire family, serial killers, child rapist murderers... Not what I wanted to see happen but I can see where it's not black-and-white to some people and some of those people are on the jury. I do believe if she were a man killing a woman in the same manner he would have received the death sentence.WOW. I'm speechless. Who deserves death if she doesn't?
For what ever reason they are saying this is a verdict.
Unless jurors speak, it may be hard to say. The jurors that held out may at some point wish they changed their mind.In a odd way, it is a verdict. The options were life or death. Since no death, that only leaves one option.
I wonder what the split was? Since 8 jurors always went on break together, I'm guessing 8-4.
Everyone has rights. This isn't any different from other trials where a sentencing date is set.Ugh. So she gets to dictate when her sentencing is announced. Unbelievable! Ok, I get the innocent until proven guilty, and the right to a speedy trial. BUT, she has been convicted of first degree murder for crying out loud. Her rights don't exist anymore. If she does not want to participate in the ore sentencing interview, then just pronounce sentencing NOW! I am do disappointed in our court system today?
For me, sitting on the outside not having to make this decision, I feel like I would start with the death penalty because of the cruelty,and see if any of those mitigating factors were valid and I don't think they were. Her age? She was well into adulthood. Don't even remember the other ones but I never thought any of them were good enough. But there could very well have been, and apparently were, people who view things differently.If she were a man, the outcome would have been different. I cannot believe anyone found mitigating factors to spare her life.
I guess it effect it is, since not deciding means it's a life verdict.For what ever reason they are saying this is a verdict.
And if they had come to a unanimous decision of death they may at some point have regretted that. Who knows.Unless jurors speak, it may be hard to say. The jurors that held out may at some point wish they changed their mind.
What do you mean…should it not be up to the jury to decide? Is there any place in the US where a judge decides? I have no idea. With the judge deciding that leaves it to one person to have the power over someone's life or death.Do you think jurors should be equipped to to make life or death decisions?
I'm just relieved we have a Felony 1 murder charge