mickeyfan2 said:BTW Has anybody notice a parallel with a famous family?
Ah, don't you mean perpendicular?

And, yes, I do.....
mickeyfan2 said:BTW Has anybody notice a parallel with a famous family?
hentob said:Yes--Again, perpendicular to WHAT!?!?!?![]()
Yes I did mean perpendicular to a famous family.hentob said:Ah, don't you mean perpendicular?![]()
graygables said:One doing the laundry (FOR 18 people)
One doing the cooking (FOR 18 people)
One washing the dishes (FOR 18 people)
See where I'm going here? *I* wouldn't do the laundry, cooking, dishes for 18 people, why on EARTH would I ask an 11yo to???
You can get to know the nature of the people by reading their own website in addition to all the media they produce.
As soon as baby is weaned, its care (COMPLETE care) is handed over to another child. The older children must completely care for their buddies, which, essentially makes THEM the parent. In addition to the physical care giving, they also have to "help" the younger ones learn violin (and maybe piano, I thought I read that somewhere) and assist with lessons.
It boils down to they wanted a publicity machine and they made one. The level of parental selfishness is astonishing.
PaulaSue said:Maybe I am wrong but I thought they had 4 washers and 4 dryers for the new house.
A4Disney said:Michelle even said that having her first 5 was the hardest because she had to do all the care taking herself and now with the buddy system it's easier...![]()
OhMari said:.
The little boy in the trench laying the gas line is a big OSHA no no. The trench went 2 ft-about the same height as the boy. Sure it would have been easy to pull the little guy out if the sides collapsed, but no one can go in a trench as the same height as yourself without trench walls. Maybe someone should send OSHA a tape of that illegal work situation.
At the end of the taping, the dad made a comment how nice it was to spend time with his older boys building the house. Otherwise he said, if they wouldn't have built that house, he wouldn't have had the time.
Galahad said:This is one aspect to the objection to these folks that I don't understand. What is wrong with older siblings having some (or even a lot) of responsiblities for younger siblings? It's not a new or remotely abusive idea.
kdibattista said:Although I may not agree with their choice to raise their children... it is their choice. They may be a bit "creepy" but... whatever. You watched the show so you were contributing to the "ratings" and therefore the advertisements and free "charity". I think many people here are looking for any reason to condemn them and I think some here also just want to up their post count.
Would I raise my family that way... heck no!!
Do I think it's normal... no!!!
But if we went back a couple generations I'm sure they would be looking at what we do consider "normal" and thinking we just stepped off the freak train.
That's what makes the world go round.
mickeyfan2 said:Does anybody see this home becoming a church and then tax free. He needs to do that before the 2007 tax season, or he will get too many 1099s for the free stuff. They are not great parents but great scam artists.
BTW Has anybody notice a parallel with a famous family?
mickeyfan2 said:Staight up and down would be vertical not perpendicular. The vertical stud would be perpendicular to the horizontal stud. This misuse of the word is what is so funny.
chobie said:Why do people supporting the Duggars keep throwing that word abusive out? No one who disagrees with their choices has used that word.
OhMari said:It will be interesting to see if this happens. Did anyone catch how much the family spends at Aldi's for groceries. My husband was talking and I missed it. If I heard correctly, I thought he said $200.
Galahad said:I'm not "supporting" the Duggars. I have no interest in living the way they do. My reason for citing the word "abuse" is to circumvent the argument before it is made (as in "but it's abusing to make kids do their siblings laundry"). So what is wrong with a hierarchical way of running a household?
It's not really a matter of "disagreeing" with their choices. They are being profoundly ridiculed with very little information about them. If there had been a show about another family with a different life style and posters ridiculed them for it they would be pounced on for their backward bigotry.
chobie said:However, no one here or anywhere has suggested that they NOT be allowed to make the choice. That would be bigotry and intolerance.
mickeyfan2 said:Sorry a level makes a stub vertical NOT perpendicular. There is no measurement of the angle at the base which would have to be 90 degrees IF they are perpendicular to each other. So she is using the word wrong.
SPAM said:this link was on their family's website.
http://www.wholesomewear.com/page-3.html
Galahad said:So if somebody declares they don't want their child to have a gay teacher but they don't advocate a law or rule against gays being ALLOWED to teach, they they aren't bigoted or intolerant?