unclescrooge_0707
...And the flowers croon...
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2008
- Messages
- 675
Is the colour different on the disboard? The blue looks... lighter?
This is something I wanted to agree with. Nate, you're right, and i wanted to agree, this is well said.
and years? that does merit a
I was gonna weigh in on this... but I'm not going to.
But whomever used the "walk a mile in their shoes, that way, when they chase after you you're a mile away and have their shoes." I love that quote.
IS Quick Service Dining enough food? I mean, you have 2 teenage boys (right?). Were they ever "hungry" during your vacation?

to merit a PG-13 rating. But, i wasn't looking for that type of thing either. (and at 8 & 6 & 3, my boys don't QUITE notice that stuff yet.)
Thanks. We'll actually have 1 adult per minor (Thanks to a friend that is a DisDad-in-training), So I really don't know what's going to happen until we book our rooms.
THIS is funny.
And yes, Joplin was crushed, and the news just said 116 people died. There's lots of people in StL with family in and near Joplin (it's only 5 hrs give or take) down I-44, so really rough.
But thank you for the note. It was appreciated.
I would like to post a clarification of a RANT I posted this weekend.
In regards to the whole May21st EotW.
What my point was...which after reading my rant was not clear...it is my practice to be respectful of everyones beliefs...regardless of how misguided I feel they may be. Because wheither we believe the same thing or not...that belief is very real to those whom believe it...wheither they are blindly following someones teachings or they came to this belief on there own.
I felt it reflected badly on us as a group to sit around and poke fun at others beliefs.
And thru it all...the one person I saw that made a well reasoned discussion got called out as being "preachy". While poking fun of the same subject was perfectly acceptable. That's not how I roll.
Again, well said, Nate
It's so easy to have tone misconstrued on-line. What you might intend to be a gentle poke, another might interpret as a huge slam. What is remarkable about this group is that over the yearsscared1
, we've never degenerated into "trolls" or "flaming" and have been able to discuss a variety of topics in a civil and respectful manner. I'm confident that this pattern will continue.
![]()
This is something I wanted to agree with. Nate, you're right, and i wanted to agree, this is well said.
and years? that does merit a

But while we're talking about sensitive off-topic topics, I'll bring up another one
Have any of you Scout dads had any issues with gay co-workers? Boy Scouts of America has a strict no-gay leader policy
Actually, this characterization is contrary to both the historical development of the change in BSA policy to ban the participation of gay leaders and to the scientific evidence regarding homosexuality. First, a wide range of not-for-profit organizations sponsor Boy Scout troops. Even if we are limiting the discussion to religious organizations who sponsor Boy Scout troops, not all religious organizations share the same attitude about homosexuality. What BSA did was to change the former policy - which said absolutely nothing about the sexual orientation of leaders - to introduce a new policy that excluded homosexual leaders regardless of the position of the local sponsoring authority on the issue. The policy change was forced upon all sponsors because a majority of BSA's voting board chose to impose their own religious beliefs on the entire organization.
I would have disagreed with banning homosexual from leadership positions in any case, but I could have understood and even been tolerant of those sponsoring organizations who chose to exclude homosexual leaders based on their own religious beliefs. But imposing a ban on others who do not share their opinion is the height of intolerance. It produces the supreme irony that there are now BSA Troop-sponsoring organizations who are led by gay clergy, but whose clergy are ineligible to be leaders of the organization's own troop.
Second, it is important to recognize that banning gay scout leaders was NOT a reaction to "previous bad incidents." That's a canard. The policy change was triggered by changes in board membership and the religious beliefs of those board leaders. Statistically speaking (and yes, I did the literature review while in law school, when the Supreme Court case on this subject was pending), straight men are several multiples of times more likely to be child molesters than are gay men, and straight men are also more likely than gay men to be engaged in abusive violence toward children. There is no categorical reason to exclude gay men from leadership positions, aside from their status as gay men.
While I can appreciate and be tolerant of relgious beliefs that cannot countenance homosexuality, the imposition of that belief on others is indefensible. THAT is what is inconsistent with the lessons and message of Scouting. And, of course, it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy, as such actions drive away those who argue for a more inclusive approach, further consolidating the power within the organization of those who imposed those restrictions in the first place.
I was gonna weigh in on this... but I'm not going to.
But whomever used the "walk a mile in their shoes, that way, when they chase after you you're a mile away and have their shoes." I love that quote.
One thing I didn't ask during the podcast, Nate...Arron (AJRitz) or Mark (prattpak) since you guys are so instrumental in the production of our Podcast...
Could one of you start a Podcast Thread and in the first couple of post start an archive of links to the Show Notes and Downloads page on disdads.com?
I thought about starting it...but felt it would be better if one of you started the thread.
While the disdads.com site is nice most of our traffic is over here.
For example...
Episode 7 The Great Dining Plan Debate
Show Notes and Comments
Download
IS Quick Service Dining enough food? I mean, you have 2 teenage boys (right?). Were they ever "hungry" during your vacation?
While I didn't appreciate the $37.50 for 5 of my 6 family members to see POTC4, I enjoyed it. And, maybe I'm desensitized to it, but I didn't see enoughWell you will have to learn to play the trumpet or bugle...also you will need a goat and be able to wave your hands in a specific manner.


Yes you can make absolutely sure you will get connecting rooms!! I do not Have any experience with DVC so if that is what you are referring to then. Sorry for the reply.. But here is how you can get guaranteedconnecting rooms..
You must have more minors than adults.. Or it's a no go. When you book your room you 1.must call the Disney reservations number to make reservation
2. Your party must exceed the normal room occupancy guidelines.( makes you eligible to book two rooms on one reservation.)
3. Once they book at least one adult and two children in each room on the same reservation. You will get connecting rooms!
If you let them make two reservations for two different rooms.. It's a no go!
But if your reservation includes two rooms they will be connecting if the hotel has connecting rooms.![]()
Thanks. We'll actually have 1 adult per minor (Thanks to a friend that is a DisDad-in-training), So I really don't know what's going to happen until we book our rooms.
THIS is funny.
And yes, Joplin was crushed, and the news just said 116 people died. There's lots of people in StL with family in and near Joplin (it's only 5 hrs give or take) down I-44, so really rough.
But thank you for the note. It was appreciated.