Dolce27
<font color=teal>It's kind of hard to ride with so
- Joined
- May 14, 2006
- Messages
- 3,893
Remember my post the other day about being called an anti-Semite? Well, now, those of us who support Palin are also "religious zealouts" and we need to really think about why we supported the ticket. "Clearly" many of us had a problem with a black man as President. And "clearly" we are against Jewish people. Never mind that many of the GOP is constantly fighting for Israel. And clearly we need to "get over it" and "clearly" we don't like anyone.
And "clearly" I think some people are barking mad.![]()
At first I cried, and then I went on YouTube and found Handel's "Messiah" and listened to that. If you want to call me a zealout because I'm a Christian AND a conservative, knock your stinking socks off. In fact, I think I'll take that as a compliment. I think I was actually called an evil genius and an idiot all in the same breath. Funny, but that seems a bit contradictory to me.![]()
People sicken me, they really do.
And now I need to catch up on this thread, for real, and ignore the nonsense elsewhere.
Listen. I've come to the realization that those who are so big about crying racism if you didn't support Obama are the ones who have the problem with race - not us. And as for being called religious zealots", as you say we now are, for supporting Palin? It's just more vile attacks to discredit Palin. Palin was an excellent candidate that symbolized the true change this country needed and that is why there is so much vile hatred towards her from the other side that still, even now that the election is over, continues. They think if they continue their vile lies about her, the vile smears about her and attack her supporters than she'll go away never to return. The OS don't want her to return. She's not their candidate and she'll always pose as a serious threat to whichever candidate they have running.
In a round about way. I stated, I had friends in East Germany that thought it was ironic we voted in a socialist POTUS. They thought we were stupid. Of course, the OS start the but, you're wrong...the "whole" world loves bo. They started attackin'. I said, "bless your heart" ...I was laughed at and called "Jesusy"....by someone who's not a Christian. I take that as mean-spirited and a personal attack.
Then report them. I know that most of us on here never stoop down to their level and report them when they say vile stuff or when we disagree with them but you know that they're reading all of our posts with their hands hovering over the report button and I'm sick of it.
They're right, to a point. Obama took advantage of the Internet and really used it in his favor. We need to figure out how we can use it. But more important than that is fixing the mess within the party. If they really think the main problem is effective use of the 'net, then we're in for more misery for a long time to come.![]()
Obama had hired hundreds of kids to do nothing but sit around all day long blogging on the internet. Their mission was to smear anyone running against Obama, take control over message boards and comment sections to bash the opposing candidate and make it all pro-Obama and to even pretend - when need be- to have been a person voting for the other candidate that saw the "error" of their ways and switched to Obama in attempts to get more of the sheep (aka: clueless Americans that really wasn't paying close attention to this election) to follow the Obama heard. Is this what the GOP should do next election?
It seems that to many liberals, if you don't agree with their ideas, than you're unreasonable or irrational. Look, I have no trouble if someone thinks that Obama's economic plans are just what the country needs. As long as they have thought out the issue, and Obama's stand on it, and agrees with it, well, then more power to them. But just because someone thinks differently does not make them unreasonable or irrational.
That is just a cop-out way of trying to invalidate any supporter of an opponent. It's what they revert to when they don't have a strong enough stand on their candidate's issues themselves to hold their own in a conversation.
I agree and just want to add: I also think that they just like to argue. I think their life would be pointless to them if they didn't have anything to argue about.