I had this conversation with my buddy here at work. He is gay. We've been friends for 10 years and he and his partner are close friends of my wife, my daughter and me. He and I talk about everything under the sun, and this is a conversation that came up.
We were talking about Hate Speak, and he said this
If I call his partner ******, he would rip my face off. But he can call him ****** all he wants. His reasoning was, when a "class" takes ownership of the word, they defuse the word. It diminishes the impact. Hence when we see Ice T call Snoop My ******, he is attempting to defuse the hate content of the word. Its like he says, the word has no power.
So I asked him, then why rip my face off? If you defused it, you shouldnt react. His response was that I used it to Hate. I said, but you gave me an implied permission to use it when you said you defused it. If you can use it, why cant I? (that is the rationale that Haters use by the way)
You see, when others use the word in the fashion you mention, those that use it as a weapon are given the excuse to use it. They will say
So and So uses it all the time, it doesnt mean anything (wink wink, nudge nudge)
Yet, and this situation is an example, when it counts, it surfaces as the Hate Speak it was created for. You are using it innocently, but you, without intent, enable those who use it as the weapon it was designed for, to continue with it.
This is why Hate Speak should never be accepted as social vernacular. When I see someone defending the use, I immediately think, they are defending the hate.