NotUrsula, we were posting at the same time, but I see we're essentially saying the same thing.
Cinderelly, there's a big difference between the victim taking her own drugs and the victim being drugged by someone else. Either could be possible, but given (if it's true) that there was a "plot" against her already, the latter seems more likely. I know she was known to be a drinker, but I don't know if she was known to take drugs as well.
At any rate, I thought I'd throw what I'm about to say in here, just cause I thought it was interesting.
Speaking to my 87 yr mother about the case, she assumed the girl was raped in the "usual sense" (for lack of a better term). When I explained she was raped digitally (and I believe orally as well), she had no idea what I was talking about, and when I explained, she was confused about whether that was rape. I had to explain.
Talking to a 15 yr old friend of my son's about it (it came up), upon hearing "digital rape" (and his knowing about the case), he asked if a camera (ie digital) was put in her [female parts].
Clearly we are not all on the same page about the definitions and terms of sex and rape, etc.
I also think some of this overlaps what we were talking about on the

purity ring thread - that some forms of sex that are common among teens today (that help prevent pregnancy and maintain "virginity", ie oral and touching) are not thought of as sex by some of them.
I will say that, talking to my DS15 about a different rape case a couple of weeks ago, I was impressed he was able to define rape for me exactly, and the different types of rape - he'd learned it in Health class. I was glad they're discussing it in school, but I think we have to continue the discussions at home.