YourEveryDayAdam
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2009
- Messages
- 711
So, i'm a math geek. 
Just looking at the basic numbers, I knew DVC was far worth the cost of ownership. However, reading these boards, there are lots of people out there that use arguments like "well, if you finance it's not worth it." or "There are always coupons to use to get a discount."
So I made a spreadsheet to see just how true (or untrue) these claims were. The numbers prove that, by far, buying DVC (even when you pay full price, finance it, and no incentives) is a MUCH better value.
Just to explain the numbers: I assumed that you paid $112 per point (current retail price). No incentives on that cost. I did it based on 182 points (one week, magic kingdom view studio at Bay Lake Towers in September). I also checked the rack rate for the same room at the same time of year: $2,953 for a week.
So the numbers I ran were: Total cost (including annual dues) if you paid cash and didn't finance it for the full life of the contract. Total cost if you financed it for 10 years at Disney's standard financing rate (14.25%). I also ran the cash cost for the same time. I assumed a 5% annual increase in both annual dues and the cash rate for the room.
Here is the spreadsheet:
Break-even point on cash rate vs. non-financed purchase: 7 years
Break-even point on cash rate vs. financed purchase: 12 years
Break-even point on 40% discounted cash rate vs. non-financed: 14 years
Break-even point on 40% discounted cash rate vs financed: 21 years
Best case (non-financed, full rack rate cash) DVC savings over the life of the contract: $457,988.73
Worst case (financed, 40% discount cash rate) DVC savings over the life of the contract: $192,674.57
So, even if you financed DVC at the worst disney rate and were somehow able to score a 40% discount code for every annual visit, you will still save almost $200,000 with DVC over the 50 year life of the contract.

Just looking at the basic numbers, I knew DVC was far worth the cost of ownership. However, reading these boards, there are lots of people out there that use arguments like "well, if you finance it's not worth it." or "There are always coupons to use to get a discount."
So I made a spreadsheet to see just how true (or untrue) these claims were. The numbers prove that, by far, buying DVC (even when you pay full price, finance it, and no incentives) is a MUCH better value.
Just to explain the numbers: I assumed that you paid $112 per point (current retail price). No incentives on that cost. I did it based on 182 points (one week, magic kingdom view studio at Bay Lake Towers in September). I also checked the rack rate for the same room at the same time of year: $2,953 for a week.
So the numbers I ran were: Total cost (including annual dues) if you paid cash and didn't finance it for the full life of the contract. Total cost if you financed it for 10 years at Disney's standard financing rate (14.25%). I also ran the cash cost for the same time. I assumed a 5% annual increase in both annual dues and the cash rate for the room.
Here is the spreadsheet:

Break-even point on cash rate vs. non-financed purchase: 7 years
Break-even point on cash rate vs. financed purchase: 12 years
Break-even point on 40% discounted cash rate vs. non-financed: 14 years
Break-even point on 40% discounted cash rate vs financed: 21 years
Best case (non-financed, full rack rate cash) DVC savings over the life of the contract: $457,988.73
Worst case (financed, 40% discount cash rate) DVC savings over the life of the contract: $192,674.57
So, even if you financed DVC at the worst disney rate and were somehow able to score a 40% discount code for every annual visit, you will still save almost $200,000 with DVC over the 50 year life of the contract.