npmommie
<font color=red>Channels George Michael in her car
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2007
- Messages
- 7,378
OP said her husband runs on this road all the time by himself, but she only objected to him taking their dd with him.
I guess I don't see how it's no problem for the dh to go by himself, but him taking the dd on that road is a problem.If it's too dangerous for the dd to be on the road (supervised by an adult, that it!) then isn't it too dangerous for the adult to be on the road alone?
(I can see why it would be too dangerous for the 10 year old by herself, but supervised by her dad, I think is a different story.)
Well ... I think it probably is too dangerous for him to run on those roads. However, since he runs on the roads everyday he has become immune to the possibility of danger. The condition of the road and the traffic passing at high speeds only a few feet away have become an everyday occurrence to him.
Yes, I do think its too dangerous for him too. But many do run, walk, and bike on this particular road. but yes, he does it all the time when he is running long distance.
the difference is that when he is alone, he is making the decision for himself only, when he has a child with him he is also making the decision to take her in a situation I would not and that he knows I feel strongly about.
and I have to also add, she has never walked on that road, that day was the first time.
I don't make up rules for him to follow, but I do feel strongly about certain things, and keeping them safe is one of them.I would not have apologized to you; I would be looking for you to apologize. You disrespected your husband and treated him like your daughter. If you need to make up rules for him to follow in regard to the raising of your child, you have other issues to deal with.
and no we don't have other issues.

he was not insulted, nor do I think of him as "lower than whale do do".
What kind of a rule is that...a father, presumably based on your post, a responsible father cannot walk someplace with his daughter because you "ruled" it out. I hope his whole life isn't a series of insults like you have dished out here.
If I were him, I would not only be insulted but I would be very angry. The person that is owed an apology is him. You must think of him as lower than whale do-do. Making rules for your children is a must to protect them from themselves, but with a parent those rules should, naturally, be flexible. She wasn't alone, she was supervised and probably having a good time with her dad.
It is incredibly insensitive and domineering to think that no one but you can protect her from harm. Secret: there is no way to protect your child from danger forever, sometimes danger comes to you. I can sympathize with your fears but they must be tempered with common sense. This has none of the common sense needed.
To the statement "The next time she wants to run on that road is she going to say, "Well, Dad lets me." He doesn't let her run on the road by herself does he? If not, then DAD, does not let her.
I wouldn't let my 10 year old drive a car, but they could certainly ride with me when I went some place. This topic is the same and not even close to being reasonable.
and I do not think I am the only one who can protect her
hmmm, don't lead him around by the nose, but I am able to voice my concerns about things, doesn't mean he has no back boneI am sitting here in total disbelieve at how many on this thread think it is OK for a wife to tell their husband where he can and can not walk with HIS daughter and that there are grown men out there that let them do it!!! (and even apologize)
Sorry but I don't want to be married to a man with so little back bone that he would go along with this and I'm sure as heck not raising my son or daughter to be lead around by the nose like this.
And maybe this is the OP's freak out point. Maybe for others it is riding on a motorcycle. That doesn't mean the OP completely dictates things the husband can/can't do with the kids. Maybe she has a reason for the skittishness over the busy roads. It's not always so black/white.
exactly. I don't completely dictate what he can and can't do, but there are certain things that are my freak out point,
and walking with speeding traffic just a few feet away is one of them.
what would he do in the blink of an eye if a car veered into them?
and I know there are uncontrollable dangers every day, but in my opinion that one was controllable by not walking on the road from the start.
That is one of mine as my father was killed on a motorcycle when I was 12-years old. If my DH allowed my DD to ride on a motorcycle there would be hell to pay.
First, I'm sorry.
See this is what I mean about it not being so black & white. This doesn't mean you lead your husband around by the nose. All this means is that this is your unnegotiable "thing". Maybe the busy street is the OP's trigger. And by the way, husbands can have their triggers too.
im sorry too.
and what mickeysgal said is true.
If it's too dangerous for the dd to be on the road (supervised by an adult, that it!) then isn't it too dangerous for the adult to be on the road alone?
My siblings and I still tease her about that to this day and all of us managed to move out by 19, lead productive lives and we all do fine in the kitchen! 