I'm not picking back at you but what are we considering "stay after school" time?
That depends on what the teacher's contract is. Our contracts (at least mine) have always had defined contracted times. Staying in the building after that time is uncompensated and should not, imo, be "expected" by parents.
Teachers should be available for time with the students after the bell rings each day. If my son has to take a test due to being out sick he is out by 3:30/3:45, his bell rings at 3:05. I wouldn't consider that after school hours.
This sounds good in theory, and IME the contracted end time is usually 30 min to an hour after the students leave. However, just because the bell rings at 3:05 doesn't mean a teacher is immediately available to begin helping a student that moment. IME, I have always had duties to perform when that bell rings - whether it is hall duty, bus duty, or any of a few other duties. Also IME, those duties take 15-20 minutes, depending on how long it takes for buses to arrive, load, and clear out. So expecting a makeup test or extra help to be able to be completed within 30-45 minutes of the bell ringing isn't always possible.
Am I saying teachers shouldn't stay after? no, I'm not. But yes, that time IS after school hours and is generally assigned to other required duties. Being appreciative and recognizing that, as opposed to
expecting it and demanding it, is only respectful IMO.
During these times he has to deal with substitutes who don't have a clue and no real school work is given out or getting done.
That may be the case in your son's school - that doesn't mean it is everywhere. As a certified teacher who has subbed a lot, I have
always been given "real" lesson plans to adhere to and "real" classwork to give out. Yes, even at the HS level. As a teacher, on the rare occasion that I am out of the classroom, I leave "real" lesson plans for the sub to follow, and do whatever I can to get a sub in my room who is certified to teach in my subject area. I realize this too is just my personal experience, I'm just saying i wouldn't write off all teachers as giving busy work (or no work) just because of your experience.
One thing that everyone should understand is that most people do not work in the school system. Most people do not have extended time during the summer months to take their vacation!! It is a hardship for us to take off in the summer months. I chose my career and accept what my current employer expects and the limitations it puts on me. If it becomes a problem for me I will change jobs. But for now when we do get time to take off to spend with each other you bet my child will be there with me whether it is during school or not.
The assumption that because teachers don't have students in the summer that that means they're on vacation, or able to vacation is just that - an assumption. So many people here mention that they can't travel at certain times (say, summer) because of their spouse's job. OK - well teachers have spouses too. What if the teacher's spouse can't travel in the summer because of their job? Should the family be forced to travel without one spouse in order to vacation?
This isn't even mentioning that many teachers have to have secondary jobs in the summer in order to continue paying their bills and so, no, may not actually have that time "off." Or they may be taking classes in the summer (and therefore also not able to vacation) in order to maintain their teaching certification. Many teachers also lesson plan/develop curriculum in the summer for the upcoming year. All I'm trying to point out is that just because school lets out doesn't mean that teachers are lying around the house all summer with nothing to do.
Folks should try to be understanding of other people and their situations
Yes, yes they should....both parents and teachers alike.