Dean
DIS Veteran<br><a href="http://www.wdwinfo.com/dis
- Joined
- Aug 19, 1999
- Messages
- 39,228
What statements are erroneous? It's appears painfully obvious to me that many people bought into DVC with a number of assumptions. Many of these are wrong and some fall into the area around this issue of renting. We see it all the time here and elsewhere from newbies and long term owners alike in all areas of DVC. We see posts not uncommonly to the effect "I didn't even think one could rent out DVC points". It's also obvious that some have made assumptions of what is "reasonable" from a renting standpoint. Some of these may be reasonable assumptions asnd others are definitely not. IMO, any assumption that includes motive per se, price, time of year or simple venu of renting (ebay) in the definition is invalid and not reasonable. That's my opinion, no more and no less. Any definition must be factual, reproduceable and be able to be applied without direct knowledge of the person involved. It must be a definition that does not overlap with the "noncommercial" renting. Even one who rents for a single time can use ebay and anyone in their right mind will get as much for their rental as possible unless there is some other motive to give someone a price break.Originally posted by Desperado
That's all well and good and a more reasonble post than your earlier one, my contention is with your erroneous statements
While we can disagree on the the issue of of enforceability, and we do, I can tell you the components I think could be reaasonably defined as commercial under the POS. Certainly anyone who hangs out a sign and buys radios and newspaper ads would fall into that category. Anything associated with another related business, such as a DVC resale broker renting out points through their busines. For individual members, it'd have to be a pattern of renting over multiple years with multiple rentals and a large number of points involved. Exactly what these would be would have to be published and documented and only then would they apply going forward. And it'd have to apply to EVERYONE who rented, including DVC. Again, MY opinion.
I am alwasy amazed and amused when people decide what they want to happen, what they like and don't like, and then try to fit the rules to their desires. This probably happens for DVC members in this arena of this discussion more than any other. I'd guess smoking and room occupancy are pretty close. I can understand when someone is upset seeing the time they couldn't get for rent on a BBS or ebay. Still, that's the system, period. The only real way to control this is to bar ANY rentals, which would be hard to do but could be done with a vote of the membership. The problem is that such a move would increase dues and eliminate most of the exchange options like DC, CC, DCL and Adventurere collection. It would also reduce the value of the contracts significantly. I guess we can't have our cake and eat it too, you take the good with the bad, etc.