The most obvious benefit (to Disney) is that buyers will only have 41 years of ownership. Disney isn't obligated to offer 50 years on new resorts / associations, but it would have been a bad look if they made IT a separate association with only ~40 years remaining. Similar to the Big Pine Key addition at Grand Floridian, the one association gives DVC the rooms back about a decade sooner. And means they can continue selling as one unified property after this expiration.I’m having a hard time understanding disneys decision on the same association. From what I can tell there is absolutely no reason to buy direct if you buy poly points planning to stay there, and are already blue card through another purchase??
Also I'm sure there are some operational benefits in terms of not running two sets of books for the same physical property.
Disney still has the ability to block resale owners from Riviera, Cabins, Disneyland Hotel and future destinations. Plus all of the perks like Sorcerer AP, lounges, Moonlight Magic, etc. The majority of their sales are to new buyers. I don't think they have to be overly concerned about sales stagnating over the volume of current owners adding-on via resale.
Last edited: