Well put......I think we'd all like to see a really well thought out master plan than a piece-it-together as we go.
I agree completely. But, if anyone can do it, I'd bet on WDI---if management will allow them to create magic without restraints.
Well put......I think we'd all like to see a really well thought out master plan than a piece-it-together as we go.
If they are really re-thinking and considering some type of D or E-ticket attraction in that area, there's no way it can go from concept to design to permitted to constructed by 2012.
Thanks for the picture!![]()
No problem no if you look at the picture and that huge section that says more Dumbo. I am mostly sure that most of that area will not be Dumbo. IMO there will be a wall behind Casey Jr. and they will use that land for future expansion.
Thanks for the picture!![]()
Looking closer at those plans, are they planning to retain Pooh's Playful Spot, even after moving the tree? That's what it looks like here.
The "MORE DUMBO?" and "CASEY JR" labels just seem wrong to me. "MORE DUMBO?" would theoretically be where the rest of the "circus" stuff would be - more or less a rebuild of Toontown Fair. I wouldn't say "future expansion" as much as "fluid plans". to label it "MORE DUMBO?" seems foolish, unless they are calling the theme "Dumbo".
But a huge label placing a food cart and some merch? They could fit one or two attractions in that space.
Looking closer at those plans, are they planning to retain Pooh's Playful Spot, even after moving the tree? That's what it looks like here.
The "MORE DUMBO?" and "CASEY JR" labels just seem wrong to me. "MORE DUMBO?" would theoretically be where the rest of the "circus" stuff would be - more or less a rebuild of Toontown Fair. I wouldn't say "future expansion" as much as "fluid plans". to label it "MORE DUMBO?" seems foolish, unless they are calling the theme "Dumbo".
But a huge label placing a food cart and some merch? They could fit one or two attractions in that space.
I don't think those are actual plans, but someone modifying the old leaked FLE plans to show what the rumor suggests might happen.
I agree, somone tried to make a"blue print" and accidently left pooh's play place on it. Disney spent a lot to move that tree to plan to move it right back. And to adjust the Pooh Que around the tree's new spot.
I'm not sure saying there will be a Snow White coaster is too bright either. Since the is a kid coaster just over from it and there is already a mine coaster in the park.
It is not reall going to be a coaster mor like a thrilling dark ride.
I'll withhold judgement, since we have way too little information to go on anyway, but my concern this could be yet another thrill ride which excludes too many people who tour the WDW parks daily (seniors, young children, those in poor health, us chickens...). A tame coaster-type ride, even if more like a dark ride than a roller coaster like Big Thunder Mountain, may exclude certain groups while also not appealing to those looking for more thrills in theme park attractions. A "thrilling dark ride" is probably much better (again, we just don't know yet), but this has commonly been referred to (on that other site, especially) as a "family coaster" - which is often a contradiction in terms.
I'll withhold judgement, since we have way too little information to go on anyway, but my concern this could be yet another thrill ride which excludes too many people who tour the WDW parks daily (seniors, young children, those in poor health, us chickens...). A tame coaster-type ride, even if more like a dark ride than a roller coaster like Big Thunder Mountain, may exclude certain groups while also not appealing to those looking for more thrills in theme park attractions. A "thrilling dark ride" is probably much better (again, we just don't know yet), but this has commonly been referred to (on that other site, especially) as a "family coaster" - which is often a contradiction in terms.
Again, this sounds like a new ride or attraction, and not something that is on the shelf or a copy-cat (or even a modified copy-cat) af a ride from another park. If what you're hearing is true, this sounds like a new ride, requiring a lot of engineering, design, imagineering, etc.It is not going to be that thrilling the trills have been described as being somewhere in between Big Thunder Mountain and the Barnstormer. It will have lesser to medium thrills but greatly themed.
It is going to be more dark ride than coaster with D-ETicket theming.
Again, this sounds like a new ride or attraction, and not something that is on the shelf or a copy-cat (or even a modified copy-cat) af a ride from another park. If what you're hearing is true, this sounds like a new ride, requiring a lot of engineering, design, imagineering, etc.
No way it's done by 2012.
Again, this sounds like a new ride or attraction, and not something that is on the shelf or a copy-cat (or even a modified copy-cat) af a ride from another park. If what you're hearing is true, this sounds like a new ride, requiring a lot of engineering, design, imagineering, etc.
No way it's done by 2012.
I agree it won't be done by 2012 (but the FL expansion could go well into 2013 at this rate), but I don't think we are talking about a copycat necessarily. Disney has piles and piles of plans completed to various stages of all sorts of things that they have just never pulled the trigger on. They could very will have a Snow White Mine Coaster (or an unthemed basic design) completely designed in a file somewhere that could have been done 20 years ago, sitting dormant. Dust off the plans, update to current technologies, and theme.
Or they could very well purchase an existing vendor design from Venkoma or whoever and just do the theming around it.
You CAN churn out a basic small coaster that fast.
Again I doubt this will happen because it is not really a coaster.