Wow stretching just a bit there
thats reading what you want I think
The language is vague and can provide "hints" in both directions:
From the press release:
"develop new Disney Vacation Club villas at Disney’s Polynesian Village Resort"
New Villas at the Poly resort -- Not new villas being added to the Polynesian Villas and Bungalows. Much like both Copper Creek and Boulder RIdge at "at Wilderness Lodge"
“Expanding our Disney Vacation Club offerings at the Polynesian" -- To me,"expanding DVC offerings" sounds like adding a new property/association. After all, if they kept the same association, then it would be adding more rooms, but it wouldn't exactly be expanding "DVC offerings"
Critical:
"proposed vacation ownership property would complement the existing resort"
COMPLEMENT the existing resort. A "proposed property" -- That certainly makes it sound like a NEW property that "complements" the existing property. Not a mere addition.
"Since 2015, Disney's Polynesian Villas & Bungalows has been a favorite resort destination" -- This may be included merely as informative of the DVC that currently exists at Poly. Or indeed, it may suggest that the "new" is going to be included int he association that has existed since 2015.
So in total... I wouldn't draw any conclusions based on the wording of the press release.
In part, I'd look to the size. Poly is already over 300 units, which isn't a small DVC association. If this adds another 300 units, I would lean towards them starting a new association. In reverse of GFV, if this only adds another 100-150 units, I would more likely expect them to add it to the existing association.