
untitled-216.jpg by Havoc315, on Flickr

untitled-163.jpg by Havoc315, on Flickr

untitled-83.jpg by Havoc315, on Flickr
Originally a single picture that I made 7 copies of, 3 of them I raised the exposure by 1 and the other 3 down by 1. Then ran them through Photomatix exposure fusion natural followed by Nik Color Exef pro contrast and detail enhancer with a little noise reduction in Lightroom.
Above the Sea by Mike Sperduto, on Flickr
Mike,
I really like how that came out.I did something similar with a few of my photos from Disneyland. I shot them with my NEX-3 and started to get into HDR so I went back and created an over and under exposed copy in LR. Like you I then ran them through Photomatix but I don't have Nik Color Exef so I brought it back into LR for some more adjustments. Here is one in Carsland. You did a much better job with the blacks.
![]()
I know the a3000 has received a lot of (deserved) criticism; however, at the end of the day all I care about is putting a 20MP sensor behind vintage glass. And despite my dislike of the E Mount, it is an ideal choice for using adapters.
Very nice! Camera looks cool with those lenses on.![]()
Thanks! I agree, the old lenses look nice with it.
I picked up the a3000 "used" for a bit more than $150. And by used, the previous owner had opened the box and removed the lens but never touched or fired the camera. It was like getting a brand new camera body.![]()
Traitor. You're going to kill the a-mount.
But yeah.... Does look pretty cool. The e-mount is indeed a great way to experiment with various lenses. And the a3000 may have lots of negative points, but it's ultimately a pretty nice camera for that price. Nothing wrong with the iq.
I just pulled the trigger on an eBay Minolta 200/2.8 APO prime...
Bit more than I usually spend on a lens... hoping I find it worthwhile.
Figured less weight then a 70-200 2.8, results should be even nicer than a 70-200.
I just pulled the trigger on an eBay Minolta 200/2.8 APO prime...
Bit more than I usually spend on a lens... hoping I find it worthwhile.
Figured less weight then a 70-200 2.8, results should be even nicer than a 70-200.
Nice! I do love prime lenses.
The size and weight difference is definitely nice. It'll be interesting to hear what you think about it. I picked one up a couple of years ago and use it a fair amount but my 70-200mm has been a favorite since the day I got it and I wouldn't give it up however I haven't used it as much since getting the 200mm. The 200 APO does focus a bit slower than my 2.8 zoom though.