Pentax general discussion

Don't be confused. There is a reason we have Av, Tv, Sv, TAv and P modes on our Pentax cameras!:rotfl2: (Also Green, B, M and X). I primarily shoot in Av. When I'm shooting auto racing, then its Tv. Once in a while these modes just won't work and then its time to switch to a manual mode. For me, the key is to know when to switch. It sounds like you are taking the right path in getting to know your camera and its capabilities. This also extends to each of your lenses. Each lens has its capabilities and sweet spots. Learn these and it will be difficult to go wrong. I know this is a simplified viewpoint, but it works for me. Once you know your equipment (and the theory of shutter speed, aperture and ISO), solutions to difficult shooting situations just seem to pop into your head. Good luck and keep practicing!:thumbsup2
 
See how much I have to learn! It's embarassing to be this ignorant about photograpy!

You really have to spend a couple of days reading the manual that came with it. It will tell you how to customize the camera to your needs and also includes a handy guide to what all those symbols mean lol!
 
Hi:
What does DA vs. FA mean on a lens? I told you it was stupid. FA = fully automatic?????

I'm quite happy with my two kit lens for my K-X (thanks guys for suggesting this camera - I adore it and carry it everywhere now) but my husband wants me to pick a new lens for my birthday. Of course, I'm not going to say "no" or I'll end up with a gift I don't want! LOL.

Two choices:
Pentax 50 MM f1/4

or

Pentax 18-250 (cons : lens creep and distortion of the edges at 250mm)

I've read reviews and I'm leaning towards the 50 mm but the 18-250 would be sweet for our next Disney trip (only one lens to carry).

Advise this newbie or send me in a different direction!

Edited to add: What's your opinion on buying a used lens? I wouldn't be opposed to buying one of these used so I could justify buying both at once! I've checked the Pentax Marketplace, any other place to look?
 
The DA is a digital only lens. They will not work on a film camera or any future full frame digital Pentax. I do not know if they will ever make one, but it seems likely that they will eventually. There is also no aperture ring on the lens as it is handled only in software.

The FA is from the film age and will work on a full frame. They are auto aperture and auto focus. They do have an aperture ring if you want to use it, but go full auto if you put it on "A".

If you see an older lens with SMC-A then that has auto aperture, but is manual focus. A SMC-M is completely manual. There are some other versions as well, but I think that covers the majority of what you will see out in the used market.

All that said, the FA 50mm f/1.4 is a great lens! I love mine. If low light is important to you, then I would go with that.
 

Sorry for the duplicate but ukcatfan and I were writing at the same time!

FA lenses were designed for full frame (film, since Pentax does not make a FF digital camera) cameras and DA are for APS-C cameras (smaller sensor). Here is a website that explains all the Pentax designations.

http://www.mosphotos.com/PentaxLensesExplained.html

The lens I won't go back to WDW without is the Sigma 30mm 1.4. I am obsessed with getting good images on the dark rides!:rotfl2:
 
neither lens is a bad choice I went with the F50 1.7 after having the Fa50 1.4 for me the F series lens just gives me better color rendering but I think thats a completely personal choice. I have the Tamron 18-250 it is a little annoying with the lens creep but a good choice when you want to cover a wide range of lengths without changing lens. Just be careful of LBA when you start looking for older cheaper Pentax glass.
 
/
I have had several of these long range zooms. Right now I have the Tamron 18-270 for my Canon. (I sold the old ones and upgraded as newer versions have come out, most recently to add VC). I've had several of these long range zooms, and lens creep seems to just be part of the deal. I don't know about the Pentax version, but the Tamron at least has a lock to keep it from creeping when you're just walking around.
 
I'd do the 50. Anytime you have a superzoom with ghat much range you make sacrifices. Most of the pentaxforums marketplace lenses should be fine. My 35 mm 2.8 Ltd is used from there - can't tell.
 
Inexperienced Pentax Owners; you NEED TO KNOW THIS!!!

Please do not read any more into this thread than I am trying to express. I absolutely LOVE my Pentax K-X DSLR. For the money, I still think it destroys Canon, and Minolta for a starter DSLR with some of the best features on an entry level camera.
One of the selling points to me was the ability to use ANY Pentax lens ever created on my new camera. It was like "Hey, you can buy up old film camera lots and use the lenses!" So that is EXACTLY what I have been doing. And I have acquired quite a collection in less than a year!
This issue hasn't been addressed here yet, so here goes:
If you use certain Sears brand lenses, you might regret it. Certain models have a ricoh pin that once the lens is mounted onto the camera the pin LOCKS into place before you can even get it fully on!
Not only is the lens LOCKED ON, but your camera is dead in the water, and can not be used.
There is a chill of regret that sweeps your heart when your new $500 plus camera is suddenly useless.
This happened to me yesterday.
There are many Google accounts of people doing the same thing, and I experienced it first hand yesterday.
I found this sweet little lens. I never even noticed it was Sears. I got both at a yard sale for $10. It was already mounted on a PENTAX camera. I had no idea it was even a sears lens. I guess I should have looked. The numbers on the end of the lens looked great, so I attempted to twist it on, and it froze. I panicked like a deer in headlights. I spent almost 2 hours trying to get it off. An hour at the inlaws house (no internet) and then another hour at my house reading horror stories of hacksaws and hammers.
I'm the impatient type on matters such as this, so here is exactly how I got mine off, and how I even managed to preserve my nice lens' usability.

I had a piece of a tape measure that had broken. I cut a 5" - 6" piece off, and began trying to squeeze it between the lens and camera body. I could tell quite quickly that it was making a huge mess with yellow paint. So I took it to my trusty grinder wheel, and I polished the 1" long tip of the tape measure scrap till both sides were shiny metal. I even sharpened the edges as best I could. I dipped it in water to cool it, dried it off, and worked from directly under the lens (Pentax K-x) and worked the blade improvised "feeler" towards the AF MF switch. As I did so I twisted the lens while holding doen the switch. Be sure it is in AF mode.
Once I had made my new tool it took me mere minutes. About 3 or 4 tops.
The lens popped right off. I then disassembled the lens and removed the pin by simply pushing it out the back of the mount. It took mere seconds. I now have a nice lens and a still "like new" non-damaged camera.
The moral of the story:
1) These references seem to focus around old Sears Lenses. So always check them thoroughly.
2) The ricoh pin in reference is probably NOT what your mind is picturing. Its a super TINY, (I mean EXTREMELY SMALL) ball bearing looking brass thing that don't really resemble a pin. So wipe that mental image of a pin out of your mind. This thing looks more like a microscopic ball-bearing. If you are inexperienced, you'd NEVER EVER know it was there.
Now that I have experienced this, I will search out similar lenses. Because of this pin, many buyers will avoid these altogether. They are great lenses, and as long as you de-pin it BEFORE you stick it on your camera, they work flawlessly! And for much less.
 
I'm sorry to read of your troubles but I love reading about your triumph!

Good job! :thumbsup2

Marlton Mom
 
WOW! You made my heart JUMP! Ugh! That sucks Dude.

But then the recovery!!!! I'm glad you have a happy ending!!!!
 
Congratulations on getting it off; I assume the camera and lens were none the worse for wear?

The old manual focus film cameras have no problem with Ricohs; one of my original K1000 lenses is a K/R (K-mount/Ricoh) Craig Optics 35-70mm. Fortunately, it works just fine on the DSLRs without a problem; I think that only some of the Ricoh lenses have issues, but better safe that sorry!

Now, the important thing - you haven't said what kind of lens it was yet. :) (Besides being a Sears.)
 
The DA is a digital only lens. They will not work on a film camera or any future full frame digital Pentax. I do not know if they will ever make one, but it seems likely that they will eventually. There is also no aperture ring on the lens as it is handled only in software.
Actually, they work on film cameras and will definitely work on any potential FF Pentax DSLR. Theoretically they have coatings that are optimized for digital use. Some of the lenses won't cover a FF sensor, but some will. The DA* 200mm F2.8 and DA* 300mm F4, for example, are updated versions of the old FA versions and cover the FF sensor fine.

Now, when you mount one on a film camera, you are stuck shooting wide open since there's no way to control the aperture. (I'm not sure if that's true with late-model film SLRs; I only have old manual ones.) And, of course, you might get vignetting on the lenses that don't cover the full 35mm sensor. If/when there's a FF Pentax DSLR, I think it's safe to assume that it'll be able to do what the Nikon and Sony FF DSLRs do and have a "crop" mode to use when using lenses designed for APS sensor sizes.
 
Now, the important thing - you haven't said what kind of lens it was yet. (Besides being a Sears.)
Its a macro lens. Sears f=135mm 1;2.8 auto.
Its nothing spectacular, but it's not bad for 10 bucks!!!
The camera survived with a tiny little scratch to my beautiful red paint. (1/3rd the size of an eyelash) and the lens survived unharmed. The mount of the camera has some surface scratches, but nothing you'd ever notice.
All in all I was really lucky. I've read stories of people using hack saws, bolt cutters, and hammers on these lenses to get them off. :scared1:
 
Just bought my first DSLR, Pentax k-x. Bought it because reviews were great for the low price. Am having trouble getting used to it. Especially with shots at night. Does anyone have this camera? And if so, what are the best settings for night and fireworks shots? Thanks!
 
I have it, but you need to give us a little more information for us to help you with night shots. For fireworks, the single most important thing is a tripod. A remote shutter release will also help. I believe that there is a fireworks setting if you are not comfortable with manual settings. If you are, then you should go with something around f/11-f/16, ISO 100-200, and a shutter of around 2 seconds (or bulb mode). That would be a baseline to start, but you will probably need to fine tune it some.
 
Got the tripod, and am ordering a remote. Finally was able to figure out how to change ISO setting (get around auto setting of 200-1600). Hopefully this will help. One other stupid question...so used to P&S, any way to get the camera to shoot faster? Seems to take forever and end up missing the shot.
 
It sounds like you are using live view. If so, try to learn how to use the viewfinder. It is much faster, more accurate on focus, and generally a better method of shooting.
 

PixFuture Display Ad Tag












Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE














DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Back
Top