You're right. I've been camped out at the post office waiting for my appointment since I originally started this thread.
A) I never DICTATED to them what time I wanted to show up. I told them I wanted to make an appointment ...
....at a specific time to meet your convenience. Dictated is an exaggeration, but you did say that you wanted a certain time that they couldn't give you REGARDLESS of why they couldn't give it to you. Staffing, sickness, lunch, computers down, another appointment....who cares. They still can't take you. Your complaint (to this forum) is that because a web site somewhere says appointments between A and B time you believe you can have anytime in that window, and if they tell you the reason why you can't....and that reason
isn't good enough for you....its' "almost" like false advertising. Do you expect them to amend their web site daily with each and every example and situation that causes them to not be able to conduct that extra service at a certain time, just so you don't have to go through the stress of being told "please pick another time"?
I never demanded anything, I never asked to talk to a supervisor, I didn't complain (except here)
Yes, and here is where we are.....that's why we are talking about this.....here. You're venting here looking for others to agree and many are telling you why they don't. I didn't mean to imply you were rude or aggressive at that time, but that your post after the fact implies your theory of what they should be doing for you.
Y
B) Going back to semantics, I never said is WAS false advertising, I said it was ALMOST LIKE (two big qualifiers) false advertising.
Ah, yes, I stand corrected. "Almost like" false advertising. Just like it's almost
not like false advertising.
C) I got over it LONG ago. You're the one who seems to have to go back to my feelings from a month ago.
HUH?

You posted YESTERDAY and I responded directly to that post. You didn't get over it
long ago, just a few days ago you re-started this conversation with the "why make the bloody appointment" posts. What the heck you talking about?
Others responded to yesterday's post before I did, yet you're not asking them why they're going back to your feelings of a month ago.
I'm so sorry you had to read the threads for the updates.
Why are you sorry that I read the entire thread before I responded to something that you just posted? How else would I be able to comment on the basis of you original complaint or on the context of your post that I responded to??????
Please show me where I dictated to THEM when they serve me.
You're right that you didn't say to them.
"I want this time, give it to me." You actually said that after the fact and posted it here. You were speaking in the hypothetical, saying that you should (your words)
be able to pick a time that qualifies and YOU make arrangements to have appropriate staffing
So I was responding to your hypothetical statement. I didn't mean to say you made that statement to them at the time.
Actually, in my mind, the strange logic is more that you're misinterpreting my post.
I didn't mis-interpret it, I simply responded to your statements about what you should be able to do, as I indicated in bold when responding. Perhaps you misinterpreted what I was actually responding to.
I get it. You didn't "dictate" to them at the time. You didn't pound your fist or anything like that. Great. But what you saying here is that you believe you
should be able to do that. That's the subject of this conversation.
Let's see, I went to the US passport site, put in my address and looked at the closest ones... 18 of the 20 are post offices. One college campus, one city hall. Now, I found out later, that one of the sites the list as 'appointments only' actually accepts walkups on Saturdays, so that's what we'll do. It's taken care of. Don't worry.
I'm not worried at all, nor did I ever express any worry. But I'm glad you took care of it.