we"reofftoneverland
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2015
- Messages
- 3,463
Actually you are getting tripped up on base year. Base year has nothing to do with it. Just look at the overall amount of points in the system for each resort for each year. Even if you argue that there should be some variability, that would mean up and down but a generally stable line. Instead, what you see is a decidedly upward trajectory. There are many more points in the system than there were five years ago. That is clearly a complete violation of the DVC contract and a watering down of membership value. This will catch up with DVC in a legal way if they do not address it.This group has a fundamental misunderstanding of what a "base year" is and how it works. All of the "analysis" that has been done is based on year-over-year changes rather than year-versus-base-year changes. Everything is within the tolerance of what's permitted in terms of variance against base year.
When they've given in and reversed decisions, it's not because you busted them doing something wrong, it's because they're caving to the membership having temper tantrums. The membership is actually preventing them from doing their jobs, which is to attempt to balance demand over the course of the year. Wonder why it's impossible to book a resort in October but super easy to get one in March? It's because the price seasons are out of whack relative to demand, but every time they take baby steps to try and correct it, the membership has a fit and pressures them to abandon the changes. Usually, it's people crying and claiming that their initial contract entitles them to be able to book a week at Old Key West in October for the life of their contract (it doesn't) and that any points increase is unfair (it isn't). This whole "points discrepancy" issue is just an elaborate version of that same complaint.

