Not sure. I still had new 5K photos showing up yesterday so you never know. Maybe give them a few days.Should I assume that if a photo hasn't hit my account yet (from the 10k), it isn't there? I know I had photos taken crossing the finish line, but there's nothing in my account. Wondering if I should give up hope that it might show up.
In the volunteer packet it said 10,000 runners for the 10k. The morning of the half they told us that the half had 14,000 registered 13,500 picked up packets as of Saturday night and it looks like 12,651 finished."They either didn't start or didn't finish."
3000 people not starting or finishing seems like a very high percentage. Are we sure 12,000 was the actual number?
Thanks for the inside info @MommaoffherRocker @Keels! And THANK YOU for volunteering!! <3
Awesome, looking forward to it!I LOVED volunteering!! I'll put together a post about Volunteering (I was both at the Expo and then on-course) - I learned a GREAT deal about how RunDisney works from that side of things ... and definitely learned how everything works when it comes to the Expo!
I LOVED volunteering!! I'll put together a post about Volunteering (I was both at the Expo and then on-course) - I learned a GREAT deal about how RunDisney works from that side of things ... and definitely learned how everything works when it comes to the Expo!
So now that you've lived life on the other side, are we too harsh on RunDisney in some of our criticisms, is it a mixed bag, or are they really as disorganized as it sometimes seems from the outside?
Frankly, I think all four factions do the best they can to execute an event without one real "dictating" voice on what should be done and what the party line/hard line is for things.
The four "factions", the way I see it:
1. Registration (Active.com)
2. Race Weekend Logistics (Track Shack)
3. Sports Enthusiast (Volunteers)
4. RunDisney/Disney (all else - merch, marketing, park operations, transportation, etc.)
RD/Disney was definitely the weakest of the four this weekend.
Interesting. Should we be surprised that #4 was the weak link, or not? Which would be more disappointing?
I don't think anyone else has mentioned it, so maybe it's just me, but the 'digital' program was almost completely useless once I arrived. If this hadn't been my third rD race, I would have been lost. I hope they go back to paper. The per unit savings on this (considering the cost of programming to replace it) is too tiny to inconvenience people to this degree.
I agree but not everyone has a smartphone. I think if they printed say a set amount maybe a few hundred or something and for those that wanted a printed one they could go ask.I don't really understand all of the negativity surrounding the digital program. In today's age of smart phones and digital devices, it makes sense on many fronts to go digital. Why make people carry around an additional awkwardly sized booklet when you can deliver the content to a device they are going to have with them at all times, anyway? It also saves a lot of paper when you consider the number of participants, so it is more environmentally friendly. I went to the DLH this year that also used the digital program exclusively. It was my first visit to DL ever, not just to race, and I found it to contain the information that I needed.
I think the cost savings are also being underestimated, too. The paper programs have to be digitally designed and set for printing, so I don't think the up front design cost is going to be significantly different between prepping the guide for printing and prepping it for digital delivery. It is a different style of content delivery, though, and the transition to that new style may be throwing some people off. I lost count of how many posts there were on here from people wanting to know how to link their bibs to PhotoPass. That information was both on the back of the bib and in the digital event guide (I was able to find it just pulling up the event guide as a non-participant). Any time there's a change there's going to be an adjustment period to it. I think we're just in the middle of that and if I were a betting man, I'd put a lot of money down that the electronic guides are here to stay. Hopefully they will continue to improve their usability going forward, though.
I agree but not everyone has a smartphone. I think if they printed say a set amount maybe a few hundred or something and for those that wanted a printed one they could go ask.
I don't really understand all of the negativity surrounding the digital program. In today's age of smart phones and digital devices, it makes sense on many fronts to go digital. Why make people carry around an additional awkwardly sized booklet when you can deliver the content to a device they are going to have with them at all times, anyway? It also saves a lot of paper when you consider the number of participants, so it is more environmentally friendly. I went to the DLH this year that also used the digital program exclusively. It was my first visit to DL ever, not just to race, and I found it to contain the information that I needed.
I think the cost savings are also being underestimated, too. The paper programs have to be digitally designed and set for printing, so I don't think the up front design cost is going to be significantly different between prepping the guide for printing and prepping it for digital delivery. It is a different style of content delivery, though, and the transition to that new style may be throwing some people off. I lost count of how many posts there were on here from people wanting to know how to link their bibs to PhotoPass. That information was both on the back of the bib and in the digital event guide (I was able to find it just pulling up the event guide as a non-participant). Any time there's a change there's going to be an adjustment period to it. I think we're just in the middle of that and if I were a betting man, I'd put a lot of money down that the electronic guides are here to stay. Hopefully they will continue to improve their usability going forward, though.