A few days ago our local paper ran an article about Denver's ban on pit bulls or dogs that even look like pit bulls. The article quotes Denver city councilor Charlie Brown (not kidding) as saying, "pit bulls are trained to attack. They're bred to do that." I was just wondering what you folks thought of this.
I can agree that some pit bulls targeted for sale to drug dealers or dog fighters etc. are bred for aggressiveness, but every dog? Shouldn't the owners and breeders of viscious dogs be punished? Shouldn't a dog be judged by it's behavior?
I guess this really upset me because the best dog I ever owned was a pit bull/lab mix. He was the most loyal, obedient, loving and dignified dog I ever met. He was always by my side, he patiently endured dress-up and various other insults from DD and her friends with just a sigh. He was quiet, protective, well behaved and a beloved part of our family, and in Denver he would have been destroyed for no other reason than his looks.
It breaks my heart to think that there are probably dozens of families who have suffered the loss of a wonderful pet like my Zeus, just because of the way it looks.
I can agree that some pit bulls targeted for sale to drug dealers or dog fighters etc. are bred for aggressiveness, but every dog? Shouldn't the owners and breeders of viscious dogs be punished? Shouldn't a dog be judged by it's behavior?
I guess this really upset me because the best dog I ever owned was a pit bull/lab mix. He was the most loyal, obedient, loving and dignified dog I ever met. He was always by my side, he patiently endured dress-up and various other insults from DD and her friends with just a sigh. He was quiet, protective, well behaved and a beloved part of our family, and in Denver he would have been destroyed for no other reason than his looks.
It breaks my heart to think that there are probably dozens of families who have suffered the loss of a wonderful pet like my Zeus, just because of the way it looks.