Maybe they're right.
Maybe one day people will look back in amazement that people actually used to sit at drawing boards and meticulously draw, frame by frame, entire movies.
If so, I hope that their amazement is rooted in respect for the passing of a wonderful art form and not based on a profit margin.
I think that if Walt were alive and somehow still running things, he'd embrace computer technology as part of the creative process. I think that he wouldn't abandon the tradition that his company was founded upon but would find a creative way to blend it all into the corporate mix.
Heck, as much as I love Carousel of Progress, I wouldn't want to go as often as I do if the place were full of attractions at that technology and entertainment level. You've gotta mix in a Tower of Terror every now and then to keep my attention. But I'll still be sure to stop by CoP each and every trip that it's open. It should be the same with the animation division. The old and the new can coexist, In fact they can be the key to success!
I don't know enough about how or why this decision was made, but I'd be rather saddened if it were just a case of a division being profitable, but not profitable ENOUGH to satisfy the bean counters and Wall Street.
I love what PIXAR has done with their films. Each and every one has been an absolute wonder. Disney's recent hand-drawn films, when they've been 'on' (The Lion King, Beauty and the Beast, The Little Mermaid, Mulan, Aladdin, and even Fantasia 2000, IMO) have been just as wonderful. Disney's support of projects like James and the Giant Peach and The Nightmare Before Christmas has been very welcome here too. The best of their live action films have been excellent too!
I think that the common factors in successful films that Disney is associated with are films that are of a high quality, exhibit a great attention to detail, are ingenious and clever, and present terrific stories.
It seems that for each traditionally-drawn film that has been a hit, Disney has pushed out several low-quality, sometimes direct-to-video, dregs. If this is the best that they can do in this medium, then they should, indeed, stop trying. When was the last, honest-to-goodness, big HIT that Disney has been able to generate with a traditionally-drawn film?
It seems unfair to expect that ANYONE in Disney show the same genius that Walt had. Or to care as much for animation and quality as he did. That's just too much to expect, isn't it?
Disney became an American (heck, world-wide) icon on the strength of three hand-drawn circles, a great deal of imagination and effort and caring so greatly that a level of excellence be maintained.
It seems to me that more than the three circles have been abandoned here.
And that's a real shame.