I'm one who thought the worries over booking the larger villas were overblown & mostly just FOMO. Same worries are now being expressed for the new Poly tower should those villas be added to the existing association.
Most
DVC Members are much more interested in stretching their points than staying in the larger villas. IMO, booking patterns for the larger villas won't change much for owners who book during the home resort priority period. The patterns are somewhat skewed right now due to the pandemic glut, but I think they will return to their pre-pandemic norms once that clears out.
I'm one of those people who still wonder how availability will look once DVC sells a few hundred thousand more VGF2 points over the next few months, and more popular seasons come up for booking. No FOMO here though: I don't own VGF, and have no desire to. Just a curious onlooker.
I
am one who isn't (primarily) interested in stretching out my points though, versus staying in what I would rather call a more
practically sized villa ( bigger or smaller). I initially guestimated how long we'd like to stay based on a few decades of family vacations, and the size of the villa we would prefer, and purchased accordingly (or as best as I could as a newbee). As we've settled into our Disney-specific vacation patterns, established preferred resorts, and further identified our seasonal preferences, we've added on points. I may be an outlier, but based on the robust resale market for add-on contracts, the add-on tool provided and promoted by DVC, and the general affliction of add-on-itis on this board, I may be in the minority, but not alone. Certainly the board isn't a representative sampling of the general ownership, but it must reflect some percentage of all owners.
Don't get me wrong. If a planned vacation straddles two seasons, I'm not averse to shifting a trip a week or two forward or back into a lower priced season and taking an obvious points saving, but I'm not limiting my trips to only the cheapest seasons, points-wise, or stepping down into a smaller villa just to get two or three more days of vacation. I can't be alone.
Again, no skin off my nose either way, but given the compelling argument that DVC will be selling Poly2 as a separate resort and promoting the existence of larger villas versus Poly1, it would appear that DVC also appreciates the existence of a sizeable market for access to units larger that studios (or "resort studios"). Certainly Poly1 is ridiculously imbalanced with zero 1 and 2BR villas, versus VGF1's more diverse offerings, but DVC certainly sees a need for larger units, versus simply pumping out more hotel room conversions.