loutoo
Mouseketeer
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2009
- Messages
- 326
Luke Skywalker is what Star Wars is about though. The entire franchise is really built around him.
Star wars wasn't about Luke, it was about Vader. For six movies it told one story, "the Tragedy of Anakin Skywalker."
People who pan episodes 1-3 do so because they don't understand this or dont care. Taken by themselves they are not great movies, viewed as pieces of a larger epic they shine in some flawed and wonky way.
The new movies, although related, are not a part of this arc. The original epic starts with Anakin's birth (or conception depending on how wacky you want to get) and ends with his death. To change this fact by stating they are about Luke is to dimish one of the great literary epics of our time and destroy the qualities that redeem episodes 1-3.
The difference in Star Wars shouldn't be viewed in the terms of the absences of Luke, but in the absence of Anakin. Ben/Kylo is as much a connection to the original epic as Luke would be.
That being said, I did love Mark hammill's portrayal and will miss him...