Not at all. Before the magic wand, I feel that part of the park was way too sterile. Now it is clear that you're at a theme park, not a college campus.OK, maybe I'm just a grump (I'm sure there are many who think this!), but anyone else think that the hand with the wand and the "Epcot" over Spaceship Earth is ugly?
I think it is great. D-MGM was created back when there was a thought that people might want to go to Walt Disney World and NOT have to be reminded Disney Disney Disney. That has changed, and I for one am happy to see more and more overt nods to the fact that we're visiting the Mouse's house!And the giant Socerer's Hat in the front of The Great Movie Ride just sticks out like a sore thumb.
I was never a big fan of kvitch, but Dino-land really works, IMHO. It's supposed to look gaudy, but does so in a very classy way -- perfect Disneyfication of something which, back in the day (and I speak from experience) was actually rather seedy. This clean, colorful version of the past is right-on-the-money for me.The gaudiest, cheapest looking addition is by far the carnival in Dino-land at AK.
And it doesn't need to go with any other part of the park. The park is a series of lands. While Africa and Asia are very similar, that, in itself, is a problem, IMHO. As far as I am concerned, the whole point of having different "lands" in each park is diversity, not to have different shades of the same color.
I couldn't agree more. That was pretty bad.By far, the most gaudy and ugly thing they EVER did at WDW was that pink birthday cake over the Castle.