True. But at least I understand a new buyer who knows nothing about the product, and doesn’t know enough to realize that there’s anything more to know, getting caught up in the excitement while on a WDW trip and buying a Poly contract, unaware that there’s even a resale market, let alone new construction plans.
What I don’t understand are buyers who actually are familiar with the resale market and Poly2, who are buying Poly resale contracts anyway. Even if they have zero interest in the new tower and only plan on staying in Poly1 studios forever, Poly2 has the potential to decrease the amount of Poly1 resale buyers if it’s a different association...and fewer buyers could mean a lower resale price in a few years. Personally, I’d rather buy a resale contract whose long term value has a greater chance of going up than going down.
I guess you could argue that even if Poly2 is a separate association the ability to use its amenities could help Poly1 value. But, then, initial Poly2 sales incentives could be, like VGF2, very competitive, especially since it will potentially have one, two and three bedrooms. So who would want Poly1 if you could buy Poly2 direct for only a little more?