LeahZ
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2009
- Messages
- 3,018
I don't agree with posting something like this on a site that's designed to plan trips and share experiences about visiting the theme parks in the Orlando area. I think the underlying reason for posting this is the hope that it may discourage people from visiting Seaworld. Which is a shame because the park does so much good and offers so much in the ways of conservation and education. Its a shame that the media and animal right activists try and paint Seaworld in a negative light when the park offers so much.
Well, first don't attack Leah, she is just doing her job. If you want to attack someone, take on me, as I wrote the blog post.
I will tell you I debated quite a lot about the blog post. I have seen quite a lot of recent anti-SeaWorld posts (on other sites). In the end, I thought DISsers might be interested to see what is happening behind the scenes. If you look at any of my other posts, you'll see I typically post about all sorts of legal issues that impact the Disney, Universal and SeaWorld theme parks. Some people have even, on occasion, said they find it interesting.
Now, I will admit, I have not been to SeaWorld nor do I have a strong desire to go to SeaWorld anytime soon. I don't believe I'm anti-SeaWorld, I just prefer to spend my Orlando vacation time doing something else and, if I want to see large marine mammals, I prefer to see them in their natural environment.
Now, if you want to talk about bias, I will admit I am no OSHA fan. Frankly, I tended to agree with SeaWorld that OSHA's subpoenas were very oddly timed. It is just that it is very difficult to get a judge to quash an administrative subpoena.
Given that this post is, so far, the only one I have seen which actually tries to explain SeaWorld's perspective on the OSHA's subpoenas, perhaps you could explain to me what exactly I said that would "discourage people from visiting Seaworld" or "paint[ed] Seaworld in a negative light."
I think the underlying reason for posting this is the hope that it may discourage people from visiting Seaworld.
I didn't take it that way at all. Granted, I haven't been to Sea World in many years, but I recall the interaction between the trainers and the animals to be a big part of the "show". If that is going to be banned, then I want to know about it so I can make an informed decision about visiting the park.
Ok, but there is more to the park than just the killer whale show. And even if the close interaction goes away, it's not like the show is going away also. There are still plenty of things to do.
Ok, but there is more to the park than just the killer whale show. And even if the close interaction goes away, it's not like the show is going away also. There are still plenty of things to do.
Marshay said:Thanks for posting! I was wondering what the current status was...we are planning a trip in Nov and I haven't kept up with this.
I hope you post an update ...I'm curious how it does relate to the other whales, too.
Is Tiilikum the grand daddy of the show?
How many orca/killer whales do they have right now?
Thanks!
wiigirl said:True....but its a star attraction.