DD, DS and I went to a puppet show tonight- the kids were so happy and had so much fun, then on the way home they literally broke out into 2 little demons from HE((. They just started hitting and punching each other for no reason
DS grabbed DD neck and was trying to choke her!
I pulled the car over and stopped them, explained to DS that what he did was ASSAULT and cannot do that and asked DD what she wanted to do- she said call the police and put him in jail, DS began to cry and said he didn't mean to do it. Then as they calmed down and I drove home, as we pull in, DS gets out of the car and has completely disassembled the charger cord to the DVD player
![]()
NOW, I'm blowing my stack
- they BOTH sat in timeout while I tried and tried and tried to fix it. After multiple attempts, I asked DS if there were any other parts,
he says,"yeah, the string part" so I go back to car and look and look- I found a small fuse, I asked DS is this the part, he says yes, so I put the thing back together....it works, THANK GOD!
![]()
I ask them what the heck is going on? They say, I don't know. DAMM told us too! So I explained to them the rules of LIFE....You don't do what someone else tells you to do ESPECIALLY if you know its wrong! Then I made them do 25 pushups....they did 2 sets of 50 on there own before they asked "how many were we suppose to do?"Oh well...then when I told them they did another set of 25 each
guess they felt really bad....
I took away their TV time and sent them off to bed.
I just don't get it?![]()
Mulan
one thing jumped out at me as i read this, and i want to suggest you think about it because it may be something their counselor needs to address.
when you asked the kids what was going on (and i assume with both the argument and the disassemby of the cord) they said that your ex told them to. this just does'nt make sense-it's a new car that's he had'nt seen until after you got the kids back, so he does'nt even know there's a portable dvd player in it. there is no way he could have told one or both to do this.
kids by nature will try to play parents against each other. in an intact family it may be saying that one parent o.k.'d something or said they could do something the child wanted to. with divorced parents it's often getting to do something or aquiring something while with one parent that the other parent won't permit. in your case i would be concerned that the kids, young as they are, are reccognizing how contentious your relationship with the ex is and how ready both of you are to anger at the other-and may have decided that since you don't communicate and compare notes on what they say, and may be developing a habit of immediatly using the blame excuse on whatever parent is not around. if this is the case it needs to be addressed appropriatly. they need to learn that they have to be absolutly truthful about their interactions with both of you because if they are'nt then future truthful negative allegations may not be believed on face value (and while they don't need to know it, you need to know that as far as child welfare goes-they need to have a track record of truthfullness so that in those instances where a truly negative issue comes up they can be relied on to convey the real truth).
btw-this may come too late if you've already arranged for delivery of the letter, but, why is there the changes with 24 hours by e-mail provision but nothing about how the other parent has to agree to it? i'm thinking that the way it's written up it opens the door to have the ex simply fire off an e-mail the day before a schedualed return saying 'i've decided to keep them another week', and with the way it's written there's no recourse. i can also see where a planned visitation could be changed to a different drop off day or time-and you, with a new job that might not be welcoming of last minute work changes, scrambling to find childcare, get time off to facilitate. something you probably want to talk to your attny. about.
as a suggestion when the email thing get's hammered out-for your protection and to create a documentation trail-look at your email system and learn how to send a document such that you receive 2 types of alerts that come back to you. one is a delivery receipt (proves it was successful in getting to the recipients email accnt) and one is a receipt for reading (proves the email was open and read-if you write the information as an attachment it can't be just scanned via the in box without opening, it has to be opened and read which triggers an alert to your email with the time and date). set up a folder on your email and send a copy of the sent communications (use the sent function so it shows the date/time you sent it), and when you get the email alert of delivery and subsequently read, send those to the folder as well. then you can show you sent the email, it was received, and it was read. if he claims to have not received it-you have proof, if he claims not to have read it you can either show he did open the letter or how long he let it sit there without reading it. i used this method when i had a problem employee who claimed not to get items i emailed him-it was a very effective tool to show he had been provided information and that he had indeed read it.