VGCgroupie
Im in this photo
- Joined
- May 29, 2017
- Messages
- 6,543
I think Cabins - Bungalows - TreehousesWhat are Cabungahouses?
I think Cabins - Bungalows - TreehousesWhat are Cabungahouses?
After the novelty wears off, I think the penthouses at poly will be pretty easy to get seven months as well. May even be the easiest to get.High point cost accommodations that almost never need home resort priority so you might as well buy the best value SAP/network points you can get to stay in them if that's your goals. Cabins at WL/CCV and Bungalows at Poly fit this bill
I'm sorta in this camp so when I can expand my empire (of points) in the coming decade+ I'll be very tempted to just by very cheap points (dues inclusive) to stay in those.
I think SSR has the biggest exit risk of all of the WDW SAP resorts. It also has zero home priority benefit.Thank you so much for this. This is fantastic data and analysis. I'm a numbers person with a finance background and I’m really impressed.
I actually did some modeling and financial analysis myself and came to a similar conclusion, which is why I went with SSR for my first contract a few months ago.
My analysis wasn’t nearly as detailed, but I did calculate NPV, future cash flows versus real-time costs, and ran some ROI scenarios in case I decided to rent or partially rent points in certain years. The results lined up pretty closely with what you found.
Of course, there will always be an emotional factor that can’t be measured in this kind of analysis. But for someone like me, this is exactly the type of insight I look for.
Yep, thank you for saying what I think is accurate. And now that Ive seen it in person I am so much more in love with my SAP choices of CCV and AUL-S. I bought CCV as SAP even though the upfront was more, and the CCV up front pricing has increased since I bought, I could sell it now and make $$, SSR has declined in value. So happy my very first offer ever at SSR was declined.I think SSR has the biggest exit risk of all of the WDW SAP resorts. It also has zero home priority benefit.
It goes back to the “deep value” vs “quality at a reasonable price” debate.Yep, thank you for saying what I think is accurate. And now that Ive seen it in person I am so much more in love with my SAP choices of CCV and AUL-S. I bought CCV as SAP even though the upfront was more and the CCV up front pricing has increased since I bought, I could sell it now and make $$, SSR has declined in value. So happy my very first offer ever at SSR was declined.
A lesson some of us have learned the hard way.It goes back to the “deep value” vs “quality at a reasonable price” debate.
Yep, thank you for saying what I think is accurate. And now that Ive seen it in person I am so much more in love with my SAP choices of CCV and AUL-S. I bought CCV as SAP even though the upfront was more, and the CCV up front pricing has increased since I bought, I could sell it now and make $$, SSR has declined in value. So happy my very first offer ever at SSR was declined.
Vero Beach is probably the biggest exit risk, but it has some home resort priority benefits. Even OKW had the cheap GV that are 11 month only rooms.I think SSR has the biggest exit risk of all of the WDW SAP resorts. It also has zero home priority benefit.
Sure, no one ever bought VB as SAPNobody buys VB as SAP. If they are smart enough to know what SAP is they should be smart enough to know VB as SAP is a terrible, no good, very bad idea.
Sure, no one ever bought VB as SAP![]()
Usually a safe bet and recommended given this is a site I’m guessing most of us escape to in hopes to plan our next trip away from the “fun” of work/stress of “real” lifeDelete. I was advised to play nice.
Yep. I saw the original post and I don’t think it was warranted; glad it was changed. No need to assume the worst; most have good intent here!Usually a safe bet and recommended given this is a site I’m guessing most of us escape to in hopes to plan our next trip away from the “fun” of work/stress of “real” life![]()
It was 100% warranted based off previous interactions. Well when someone follows you around and feels the need to poke at you it's hard to not want to defend yourself. I shouldn't have to put someone on ignore to be left alone.Yep. I saw the original post and I don’t think it was warranted; glad it was changed. No need to assume the worst; most have good intent here!
I am fine with debates I have had plenty of them on this forum, I can handle differing opinions. I don't take kindly being told to apologize for mine, especially by a man. And yes dont @me, regardless of how you think that makes me sound.I dunno. It’s a public forum; you sort of have to ignore the folks driving you nuts or you sound like “don’t @ me!”
But I didn’t see the prior interactions.
@VGCgroupie , I think you are fantastic!I am fine with debates I have had plenty of them on this forum, I can handle differing opinions. I don't take kindly being told to apologize for mine, especially by a man. And yes dont @me, regardless of how you think that makes me sound.
aww thanks. I for sure think you are too.@VGCgroupie , I think you are fantastic!
How am i following you when you reply to my thread with another poster ? You were not in the discussion ( not that you were unwelcome, but I was not replying to you or in a conversation with you)Nobody buys VB as SAP. If they are smart enough to know what SAP is they should be smart enough to know VB as SAP is a terrible, no good, very bad idea.
I am fine with debates I have had plenty of them on this forum, I can handle differing opinions. I don't take kindly being told to apologize for mine, especially by a man. And yes don't @me, regardless of how you think that makes me sound.