cats mom
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2000
- Messages
- 5,337
This is the way I've always looked at it-
Low- Barely getting buy, living on credit, living on gov't assistance, paycheck to paycheck. Maybe has some substantial debt. No savings
Middle-Low Getting by, living on credit when needed, has some debt or no debt but pinches pennies, pretty much paycheck to paycheck. Clips coupons, finds deals etc to cut costs. Hard to go on vacation due to money issues. Little or no savings
Middle-High/Middle Not living paycheck to paycheck, lower debt compared to income levels, affords yearly vacations without hassle, able to buy a vehicle and pay for it without much trouble. Able to get "wants" without much issue. Has savings. Has to work to keep the money coming
High - Makes comfortable salary, spends money on whatever and whenever, has savings, just a comfortable living situation. Income from investments and working.
Sounds reasonable, although as Dawn already pointed out:
If I make $250K per year but spend $300K per year, I am poorer than the person making $75K and who spends only $50K.
Where do you put my friend Stanley Johnson and everyone like him?
Find Stanley here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0HX4a5P8eE
Maybe it's a function of where I live, but I honestly don't think it's a stretch to assume that plenty of people who appear to fall in your middle-high to high classifications actually more closely fit the description of your low classification, although perhaps minus the government assistance part, at least in terms of need based aid.
So where do you put someone with an income of say $150,000 a year, but who has no savings, finances all their high end toys and vacations, and is basically living paycheck to paycheck... but in a big way of course.