The choices also listed OTHER. An Acura falls under that. Her husband said no cars in the $80,000 range. It is far from that too. Acuras actually come with better options. When someone asks for an opinion it is rude to cut that person's choice down whether they like it or not. Acuras are very nice and a step up from my Honda.
And in the OP I stated that we'd like to be in the $25k-$35k range for price. Allowing for a fudge factor of 10% (I think that's a reasonable amount of fudge room for those 'gotta-have' options like rear seat entertainment), the most we'd be willing to pay would still be well under $40k. The Acura does NOT fall under that. A base Acura STARTS at around $37k (any other trim options bump it over $40k immediately) - if we were looking in that price range I'd be asking about BMW, Lexus, Mercedes-Benz, & Land Rover instead of Chevy, Subaru and Toyota.
Price isn't our biggest concern (as I said in the OP), but we know what our target price should be and want to stay in that range if at all possible. So a suggestion that STARTS 15% higher than our stated high end target should be taken seriously?
Where is the perceived rudeness? I did use the example of the '$80k M-B Gelandewagen (G-Class)' as being obviously well out of our price range - it's a literary device called 'hyperbole'. I could just as easily said "no biggie HUMMERs please". Which brings me to another point - Does anyone else think 'biggie HUMMER' would be a good band name?

But I digress...
So if we're now nit-picking semantics, I'll go ahead and admit to misleading people with the OP / title. I admit I should have said 'below 4000lb curb weight' rather than "mid-size", but how many people know the approximate curb weight of the vehicle they drive (show of hands)?

I tried to explain the inclusion of the Honda Pilot (at 4500lb curb weight) in our consideration because it is the smallest Honda SUV (that I'm aware of) that has a V6 engine. It looks a little big for our needs, but we haven't test-driven anything so we're still considering it.
I think I rather specifically stated what we were looking for, and am asking for opinions from owners and/or drivers of these specific vehicles. I'm also aware that there's a wide world of vehicles out there for any given set of parameters, and I've not been actively researching these SUVs for very long (basically I started late last weekend). Since I've not put in hours & hours of research (yet), I was also asking people if there were models WITHIN OUR SPECIFIED PARAMETERS that I may have overlooked (the Saturn Vue suggestion was one, for example). That's why that "Other" option is up there.
For the record, here's our restated parameters - price range is $25k-$35k, size is sub-4000lb curb weight (small-size to mid-size SUV), engine is V6 (or blown 4-cyl if available in price range) with around 200hp - anything above that power-wise is gravy. I didn't bring this up in the OP, but we'd also like very good safety features (since this will hopefully be our son's vehicle in 5 years time) - like crash test ratings.
After KAMommy read this thread last night (and posted), she and I talked about the Nissan Quest I brought up. She's now willing to consider it. Here's the clinker which KAMommy figured out last night (do try this): find side-view pictures of a Nissan Quest and a Chevrolet Equinox and compare them side-by-side. Spooky, ain't it? So, what's the difference between some minivans and some SUVs - perception.