wvrevy said:
Jabber-Jaws - Saying it would be financially ruinous isn't "fear-mongering", it is simple truth. How many billions are you willing to spend to solve this "problem" ? First, you have to build, man, and arm those working on the wall. Then you have to expand the INS so that they are capable of "rounding up" the estimated 11 million people already here illegally. Then you have to house those people somewhere, and - though you may not agree - treat them humanely. Then you have to investigate every case to make certain that you have not accidentally "rounded up" someone here legally. Then you have to finance court proceedings to authorize deporting each of those people.
And, oh yeah, you then have to (further) subsidize the agriculture industry that depends so heavily on the cheap labor provided by many of these people. That also means that prices for products will have to increase.
Again, this is not as simple as "round all the brown skins up and toss 'em out, then lock the door behind them."
WASHINGTON (August 25, 2004) A new study from the Center for Immigration Studies is one of the first to estimate the impact of illegal immigration on the federal budget. Based on Census Bureau data, the study estimates that households headed by illegal aliens used $10 billion more in government services than they paid in taxes in 2002. These figures are only for the federal government; costs at the state and local level are also likely to be significant. The study also finds that if illegals were given amnesty, the fiscal deficit at the federal level would grow to nearly $29 billion.
Among the findings:
Illegal alien households are estimated to use $2,700 a year more in services than they pay in taxes, creating a total fiscal burden of nearly $10.4 billion on the federal budget in 2002.
Among the largest federal costs: Medicaid ($2.5 billion); treatment for the uninsured ($2.2 billion); food assistance programs ($1.9 billion); the federal prison and court systems ($1.6 billion); and federal aid to schools ($1.4 billion).
If illegal aliens were legalized and began to pay taxes and use services like legal immigrants with the same education levels, the estimated annual fiscal deficit at the federal level would increase from $2,700 per household to nearly $7,700, for a total federal deficit of $29 billion.
With nearly two-third of illegals lacking a high school diploma, the primary reason they create a fiscal deficit is their low education levels and resulting low incomes and tax payments not their legal status or their unwillingness to work.
Amnesty increases costs because illegals would still be largely unskilled, and thus their tax payments would continue to be very modest, but once legalized they would be able to access many more government services.
The fact that legal immigrants with little schooling are a fiscal drain on federal coffers does not mean that legal immigrants overall are a drain. Many legal immigrants are highly skilled.
Because many of the costs are due to their U.S.-born children, who are awarded U.S. citizenship at birth, barring illegals themselves from federal programs will not significantly reduce costs.
Although they create a net drain on the federal government, the average illegal household pays more than $4,200 a year in federal taxes, for a total of nearly $16 billion.
However, they impose annual costs of more than $26.3 billion, or about $6,950 per illegal household.
About 43 percent, or $7 billion, of the federal taxes illegals pay go to Social Security and Medicare.
Employers do not see the costs associated with less-educated immigrant workers because the costs are spread out among all taxpayers.
I think I found the billions we need. Also please tell me when I ever posted to put up a wall, or where I posted that I would not care if they treat them humanely. Please don't put words in my mouth. Again telling people " You are going to pay up the nose for farm good if the illegals are sent back" is a form of fear-mongering. That is using the fear of hitting your pocketbook.