The assumptions I used where based on resale prices quoted and actual dues paid.
if you used
DVC prices BLT looks even better.
Difficult to think of a better set of assumptions that can be made using data available.
If you want to make alternative assumption you can use the formula with your own numbers.
Assumptions:
- Contracts will be held for only 10 years (if you carry this further out, the advantage to SSR increases)
- SSR has already had its increase from the withdrawal of subsidies, and dues will increase 3% annually
- BLT subsidies will be withdrawn gradually, so BLT dues will increase 5% annually for five years and the same 3% thereafter
- Most of the initial depreciation of value of SSR has already occurred, but SSR's value will decrease 17% over ten years from $60 per point to $50 per point.
- Some of BLT's initial depreciation has not yet occurred, so BLT's value will decrease slightly more over ten years -- 25% vs 17% -- from $96 to $72.
-----
With a BLT price of 96 (your number), the depreciation would net a loss of $24 per point when selling 10 years out. $24.00 divided by 10 years = $2.40 per year.
BLT's dues would be $4.08, $4.41, $4.76, $5.17, $5.59, $5.75, $5.93, $6.11, $6.29, $6.48 = $54.51 or $5.46 per year.
$2.40 + $5.46 = $7.86 per point per year
-----
With an SSR price of $60 (your number), the depreciation would be $10.00. Divided by 10 = $1.00 per year.
The SSR dues would be $4.59, $4.73, $4.87, $5.02, $ 5.17, $5.33, $5.49, $5.65, $ 5.82, $5.99 = $52.66 or $5.27 per year.
$1.00 + $5.27 = $6.27 per point per year.
SSR is $1.59 per point less expensive per year.
*****
Like I said, it's all in the assumptions you use. You or I either one can make it come out however we want.