No offense, but his reasoning is not 'moot', as he was just putting an idea out there for debate (which was successful, there certainly is debate). And as to the PP who thinks if you have to pee you should go to the back of the line, well phooey to that. I'm not going to risk a bladder/kidney infection so I can meet your standard of 'fair'. If I'm standing in my proper place in line the whole time, and then I have to go and pee (especially for F! which sounds like you have to be in line forever) then I should be able to do that while my husband and kids are in line. Here's a bit of news for you - if people have to wait in line for F! for 2 hours to get 'good' seats (or any seat at all), then people who have to pee frequently would NEVER get a good seat by your rule. Ever. And that is 'fair' to you? So the size of your bladder should determine your seating for F!?
I am NOT advocating line cutting, nor am I advocating the scout method - my whole family is perfectly willing and happy to all wait in our place in line for whatever, and not scout, certainly not try to cut in front of people, etc. We also want to follow the rules. But what I AM pointing out is that there clearly are SOME people who take their opinion too far and get too inflexible and it just becomes sort of ridiculous.
I am NOT advocating line cutting, nor am I advocating the scout method - my whole family is perfectly willing and happy to all wait in our place in line for whatever, and not scout, certainly not try to cut in front of people, etc. We also want to follow the rules. But what I AM pointing out is that there clearly are SOME people who take their opinion too far and get too inflexible and it just becomes sort of ridiculous.