Ember
<font color=blue>I've also crazy glued myself to m
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2005
- Messages
- 3,468
I kept my name. It was never even a possibility that I would do otherwise.
I find the tradition of taking your husband's name to be offensive. I always question the men who feel most strongly about the tradition if they would be willing to take their wives last name as theirs. The answer is always a resounding "no." It would make them not manly, whipped, weak - take your choice. In other words: less. There is then no rational way to argue that a woman taking a man's name doesn't make her less. I see it as nothing but a gender power issue, a sexist tradition of ownership, and see nothing romantic in it at all.
I do not love my husband less because we have different last names, I am not less committed to my marriage. However, what I am is a fully equal partner.
I find the tradition of taking your husband's name to be offensive. I always question the men who feel most strongly about the tradition if they would be willing to take their wives last name as theirs. The answer is always a resounding "no." It would make them not manly, whipped, weak - take your choice. In other words: less. There is then no rational way to argue that a woman taking a man's name doesn't make her less. I see it as nothing but a gender power issue, a sexist tradition of ownership, and see nothing romantic in it at all.
I do not love my husband less because we have different last names, I am not less committed to my marriage. However, what I am is a fully equal partner.