Just a wandering thought about resale

kniquy

DIS Veteran
Joined
Dec 15, 2014
Messages
3,586
I am curious why people don't try to sell their contracts on this forum. If you get a title/closing company to work with wouldn't a seller save a little money not going through a resale company. You figure this would be the best place to list with so many interested in resale or addons. I am not sure if it just not allowed on this forum or if there is just too much risk involved.

If not allowed here where else could someone sell their membership without going through a broker?
 
DISboards.com Guidelines

If you have questions or issues regarding our policies, please feel free to direct them to corey@disneyinfo.com

I was not at all questioning the policies of the board. I was unsure of them and presuming that it wasn't allowed the second part of my question was what other options do people have. Many people, myself included, are able to sell their home without needing to pay a commission to a broker/realtor. I guess there is no official forum or website for individuals to sell.
 

Both the Timeshare Users Group and Redweek, and surely other sites, have For Sale listings. For sale listings are not allowed on the DIS, but there are lots of other avenues.
 
My experience is that most timeshares aren't worth much on the resale market and so are negotiated directly via a closer because there's not enough money involved for a broker....

With the exception of specialty brokers being paid to unload timeshares in bulk and at a loss either from owners willing to pay to get out of the trap or other timeshares that "exchanged" a worthless timeshare for a worthless discount on their timeshare.

Since DVC has real and decent resale value, it more closely approaches a real estate transaction. Add in ROFR and and purchasing a DVC resale contract without a broker isn't something a novice should do.

Here's the hook: a seller might be very experienced with DVC and easily able to navigate the resale process. Most buyers aren't. The savings is only going to the seller. So. A novice buyer would be at the mercy of an experienced seller for essentially no benefit to the buyer.

A novice buyer is much better off using a broker because there is no cost to the buyer to do so. And no. An experienced seller isn't going to pass some of the savings to a novice buyer.

Unless both buyer and seller are experienced DVC owners (and many of them DO direct transactions), having a broker is in the buyer's interest.

Since so many people start their DVC search here, no way this forum should or would put them at the mercy of an experienced seller to navigate the resale process.

While the broker represents both parties, and might even have a financial interest in a higher selling price, the broker should level the experience playing field somewhat.
 
Since Disney always has the right of first refusal on all contracts, there is practically no incentive to cut out the broker from the buyers perspective. The buyer gains an experienced agent to help them through the entire process. What do they gain by going without a broker? Maybe a lower price, but with a higher risk of ROFR.
 
Since Disney always has the right of first refusal on all contracts, there is practically no incentive to cut out the broker from the buyers perspective. The buyer gains an experienced agent to help them through the entire process. What do they gain by going without a broker? Maybe a lower price, but with a higher risk of ROFR.
MTE

As a buyer I can't see any reason to buy without a broker. Unless I was buying from someone I knew.
 



















DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest

Back
Top