I think many people who see the Gosselin situation as abusive are well aware of what abuse means. Emotional abuse is just as damaging (or more so) than the more visible and media ready physical abuse cases. Laws often don't protect kids from emotional abuse.
I don't define not being abused as them being well fed, having lots of material stuff and seeming happy. I have no idea if these kids are abused, neglected or doted on and showered with self esteem building interactions. Saying as a TV viewer on a message board one is certain these kids aren't (or are) abused can't be valid. Abuse is often silent, hidden and takes lots of forms.
I have seen things on the show that make me very uncomfortable and the whole voyeuristic vibe is not for me anymore. What I see is what becomes my reality. Everyone's perception is a bit different, but I didn't see many things I consider to be indicative of a healthy family relationship portrayed on the show.
I saw the AbuseWatch had several bits on J&k a few weeks ago, but I did think it was a bit over the top. I waffle back and forth, but the real issue for me is that there are no laws governing their time in front of the camera and no regulation of their earnings. This may very well be the abuse. No, it's not physical, sexual and maybe not even emotional abuse, but it could be an abuse. We don't know. The other thing is that they earn the money that their parents live on. That is not moral or ethical IMO. All that nonsense about how if one family member didn't want to film they would stop.....sure 8 and 5 y/o's can make that decision! And then Mommy and Daddy won't have an income. It's not healthy.
I also agree that we know too much about them. It's not right, IMO for a child to be so exposed to the entire nation. And there is also the issue that their life experiences are shaped by a tv show director and whatever sponsor is giving the freebie that week.
That's what I think anyway.