katieam1
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 1,714
http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20292198,00.html
People mags latest
People mags latest
I worked at a car dealership in college and we gave the UK basketball coach a free Explorer.
Okay - his kids are in town (the town he will live in) and he does not spend time with them? Shouldn't he take them to his new place so that they can at least see where Daddy will be when he is not with them? Just show up at the photo shoot and then leave? Sad when the only time you spend with your kids is "job" related.
http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20292198,00.html
People mags latest
I haven't checked all the links and such, but I thought I read Jon wasn't at the photo shoot...
maybe it was Kate's turn to have the kids and he'll take them to the apartment when it's his day? we haven't heard the details of their custody arrangement -- maybe if it isn't his turn, he's not allowed to be with them unless it's like the doctor's appointment the other day. (or vice versa, Kate not with them on Jon's day)
A jeweler has supposedly stated the he did sell an engagement ring to Jon while he was in Paris.
http://justjared.buzznet.com/2009/07/17/jon-gosselin-engaged/
I go back and forth on this one. On one hand, I think Jon has really lost his way and this may very well be true. On the other, this makes no sense at all. Why would a 22 year old party girl want to marry a man with 8 kids?
And why would Jon want to get tied down when he hasn't even gotten untied yet?![]()
Even if it is all true (which it could be) I think Jon would be the only one to stick by this version of the events. IMO, Kate would never want to look like the bad guy in this divorce, especially publicly eg. her statement re filing for divorce.
If it isn't true, it will be yet another tabloid story that people will forget about (like Jon's supposed engagement to Deanna). If it is true, I think we're going to be in for a very bitter divorce that will be played out endlessly in the press.![]()
Or, if it isn't true Jon may still insist it is, so he won't look like the bad guy. Even if part of it is true, that Kate tossed him, the reason why may not be true. I'm sure there will be three sides..his, hers, and the truth, just like most divorces.
So...just out of curiosity, would anybody's opinion of how Jon has acted in the past few months if the entire story were true? I think it would change my views A LOT.
You put this well!I probably wouldn't think he is as much of a "dog" or "pig" (sorry PETA). But I would kind of think that Kate had reached a frustration level with his consistent unhappiness. I just go back to something she said about Jon never being happy and that she had offered many fixes but it always came back to him wanting her to make him happy...not an exact quote but pretty close.
I suspect that they have suffered a bit from what many marriages do and that is the "roles" you take on in the beginning are often the thing that is resented later. Like Jon was young and laid-back so it didn't bother him that Kate was bossy. As years go on, it is the same quality that bothered him. I think it is one of the hardest struggles in a marriage.
So...just out of curiosity, would anybody's opinion of how Jon has acted in the past few months if the entire story were true? I think it would change my views A LOT.
I haven't checked all the links and such, but I thought I read Jon wasn't at the photo shoot...
maybe it was Kate's turn to have the kids and he'll take them to the apartment when it's his day? we haven't heard the details of their custody arrangement -- maybe if it isn't his turn, he's not allowed to be with them unless it's like the doctor's appointment the other day. (or vice versa, Kate not with them on Jon's day)
No it wouldn't change my views all that much. Even if Kate was the one to kick him out, I still think he isn't thinking much of the kids. Going out and partying while Kate was gone when he was with the kids, moving to New York so soon, posing all over St. Tropez with Hailey, knowing his picture would be on magazine covers that the kids could/would see, ect....so even if the People story is all true, I would still think the way he has been acting is selfish and immature and that he needs to grow up and stop only thinking of himself.
No it wouldn't change my views all that much. Even if Kate was the one to kick him out, I still think he isn't thinking much of the kids. Going out and partying while Kate was gone when he was with the kids, moving to New York so soon, posing all over St. Tropez with Hailey, knowing his picture would be on magazine covers that the kids could/would see, ect....so even if the People story is all true, I would still think the way he has been acting is selfish and immature and that he needs to grow up and stop only thinking of himself.
Agree with pp. I'm shocked as I get older and know more men who have remained single well into their late 20s and early 30s...dating professionals...that many of them will not actually break-up with a girlfriend. Their strategy is to p*ss them off until they break-up with them. In the spirit of non-man bashing--I'm sure there are girls who do this too. Afterall, a few weekends ago my brother's GF of two years broke up with him via text message and removing him from her Facebook friends.
I don't remember which article I read this in yesterday, but it said that Jon went later to the photo shoot. I wonder if they had him go by himself after Kate and the kids left. They said that he was still moving things into his apartment in the morning and apparently spent some time in Central Park.