If that is what they were shooting for wouldn't it be BI from us?



If that is what they were shooting for wouldn't it be BI from us?



I'd actually be kind of jealous if the kid got polka dots. I don't know how to do that!
I was thinking the same thing.
And I still can't figure out why anyone would think that J. Crew did this to create a controversy, because I for one (and I see many others), DO NOT see anything controversial about it.
I honestly DO NOT understand the commotion. It was staged, it wasn't staged, it is a naturally occurring type of event or it isn't, who the HECK cares, because there is absolutely NOTHING wrong with a little boy who has his toenails painted pink....or purple or yellow with green polka dots. IT DOES NOT MATTER, he is a CHILD for pete's sake, NOTHING about painting his toenails ANY color is going to adversely affect this child, either now or in the future, so please help me understand what the problem is.
I don't want to hear that it is "confusing", because that makes no sense to me either. It didn't confuse my brothers as children to have photos of themselves in tutus and makeup, and so far, it hasn't confused my DD (11) by playing with trucks and guns and dressing in camo gear. My brothers know they are men and my DD knows she is a girl. My DD appears to "like" boys (so far!) and my brothers both have female spouses. BUT, you know what, if my DD turned out to be a lesbian and both of my brothers had turned out to be gay, WHO CARES, it wouldn't have a DARN thing to do with dressing up in girls clothes or in DD's case playing with boys toys, it would be WHO they are, and I for one, would love them JUST THE SAME.
How is it 'Gay-friendly'? How is about sexuality at all? It's a little boy and his mom hanging out on a weekend morning.
Ok. That's how you see it. I see it as specifically using pink for a reason. We both could be wrong. I just know that advertising companies are really smart.

You didn't answer my question about how is it 'Gay-friendly'? Does pink=gay when boys are involved?
Pink makes total sense from a KID perspective.
In my opinion, society sees pink for girls and blue for boys. I've never seen a pink layette set for newborn baby boys. That's just how it is. I didn't create it.
So yes, if an advertising company was targeting Gays, they'd use pink on boys. That's how I see it as Gay-friendly. I could be wrong.

Not to get off topic, but they do sell these nifty little nail polish pens and you can make the dots with those, pretty cool actually, DD has a few.
Come to think of it, one of hers is BLACK, OMG, she might turn out to be an axe murderer since she wears black nail polish!


I don't understand why people are upset about this. ACCEPT! Accept others and their differences. This little boy likes nail polish. So what? He can wear shoes and socks to school so nobody there sees his feet. If he wants to paint is nails pink, then let him. Accept others!
. Now, my ds who never played dress up, and only played with cars and legos, is more rounded (he actually wore the shirt again).I agree with this 100% and I didn't even think of it that way before you said it. Your statement has me changing my mind about the ad. (Even though advertising agencies ARE sneaky when slipping messages into their ads.)
. Thanks for admitting that you changed your mind. Not very many people on the DIS admit it when they realize, "Hey - you know what? The other side(s) have a valid point." It's always refreshing when someone admits that they may not be 100% right all the time. Seems like lots of people on the DIS were born 100% purely, absolutely brilliant
. And so were their kids
.BTW, it's rare to enter a nail salon here, and not see any male clients.

Accept the fact that not everyone is going to accept things that are not the norm. This is not a normal mother/son activity.


Can someone define "normal" for me?![]()
Can someone define "normal" for me?![]()