bajanswife
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2004
- Messages
- 1,084
I never thought that a simple swat on the butt was abusive necessarily, but I always believed that there were more effective ways of teaching long-term lessons to children. However, over the past few years since I had kids, I have found that occasionally there are situations that pushed me towards using a spank. I am not proud that they happened, but I understand why, and I've forgiven myself for them. Mostly it was when they did something so horrendous (IMO anyway) that my anger shut down my brain, and I couldn't think past the "you will pay for this now" or "you will learn this lesson now" vs trying to come up with a response that was more teaching oriented. The word "discipline" means "to teach", and I try to make my discipline teach a long-term lesson wherever possible, but I have found that I am not perfect, and things do not always happen the way I would have planned. I have mostly used a spank as a way of reinforcing NOW (while it is fresh - young minds forget very quickly) that the particular behaviour has crossed a line into totally unacceptable and never to be tolerated. I am a strict parent, and there are many things I don't tolerate from children, so I suppose it was inevitable that I would get pushed too far from time to time.
I do think that it is possible to discipline effectively without spanking - I just don't know if I can do it. I tried, but I am not perfect at it by any means. I think some people find it easier to do than others, and I think some kids make it harder than others. This is why i try not to judge anyone when it comes to this.
Also, there are two kinds of non-spanking: there is not spanking because you just don't discipline enough, and there is not spanking because you have been able to teach through other methods. Let's not confuse the two. I'm sure lots of today's juvenile delinquents were not spanked, but I would wager that they fall under category 1. So many parents are using lousy discipline, spanking or not e.g. lack of follow through, lack of consistency, lack of attention and supervision, lack of adherance to clear boundaries etc.. I think those things I just mentioned are actually far more important that whether someone spanks on occasion or not.
I do think that it is possible to discipline effectively without spanking - I just don't know if I can do it. I tried, but I am not perfect at it by any means. I think some people find it easier to do than others, and I think some kids make it harder than others. This is why i try not to judge anyone when it comes to this.
Also, there are two kinds of non-spanking: there is not spanking because you just don't discipline enough, and there is not spanking because you have been able to teach through other methods. Let's not confuse the two. I'm sure lots of today's juvenile delinquents were not spanked, but I would wager that they fall under category 1. So many parents are using lousy discipline, spanking or not e.g. lack of follow through, lack of consistency, lack of attention and supervision, lack of adherance to clear boundaries etc.. I think those things I just mentioned are actually far more important that whether someone spanks on occasion or not.
I think sometimes people don't realize what it is like to have a child with this type of personality.
or
. We call him Tigger sometimes!
I think most parents have said spanking isn't their first resort - it's something they use when nothing else works. And, from what I know of my cats and my childhood, different punishments work for different things. If I was reading instead of doing my chores, Mom didn't send me to the corner or spank me - she took away my books. When I talked back, I was sent to the corner. If I wouldn't share a toy with my sisters, the toy was taken away. When I took a piece of candy from a store, she made me go to the store, apologize to the manager, and pay for it - and then I wasn't alowed to eat it. The last time I remember getting spanked, I had said something completely inappropriate and I totally deserved a smack for it. (Obviously the time outs weren't doing their job for that!)