glass-slipper said:
Since when is Webster's dictionary opinionary? Sorry, you have the opinion, I am stating a fact.Unless of course you are one of those people who make up their own definitions to suit themselves because they can't accept the reality.
Spank:to strike or hit with the open hand , esp. on the buttocks as in punishment. A blow or a slap.
courtesy of Webster's.
Websters also defines the word "moron" as:
1. usually offensive : a mildly mentally retarded person
2 : a very stupid person
Now tell me, do you agree 100% with both of Websters definitions? Something tells me you might not answer that question.
To me, the difference between spanking and hitting is emotion and intent behind it. I've read about spanking vs. hitting in a study somewhere, but here it is in a nutshell:
Spanking: One or two spanks to the bottom
Beating/Hitting: To strike repeatedly (also kick, punch, choke)
The Intent
Training: To correct problem behavior
Violence: Physical force intended to injure or abuse
The Attitude
Spanking: With love and concern
Beating/Hitting: With anger and malice
The Effects:
Spanking: Behavioral correction
Beating/Hitting: Emotional and physical injury
So then it should be considered that:
Spanking = physical discipline in a controlled, planned manner.
Hitting = physical discipline in an uncontrolled, implulsive manner.
Websters can pound sand.