MichiganDVC
Can barely see my Kool-aid bath with these Rose-co
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2010
- Messages
- 1,089
If you usually stay onsite, which perk would you prefer?
If you usually onsite, which perk would you prefer?
I'd keep EMH.
(Or, maybe I just don't understand the question.)
I'd keep EMH.
(Or, maybe I just don't understand the question.)
I think what the OP is trying to ask is this.
Assuming that Disney's "resources" are finite and fixed (meaning that if you want an additional FP+, you need to cut some EMH time), would you prefer they reduce/eliminate EMH in favor of more pre-selected FP+s just for Disney Resort Guests?
In my opinion, I'd take the extra FP+s (or no tiering) as I rarely use EMH, particularly at Epcot, DHS, and DAK. That said, considering we're talking about cutting one HOUR from a park's operating schedule, I don't think, financially, it's an equal tradeoff.
My understanding from another thread that the overall park hours have not shortened, just the EMH. Am I wrong?
MichiganDVC said:Looks like the poll is overwhelmingly in favor of keeping EMH. I have to admit, I'm a bit surprised. Do most people really take advantage of EMH? I usually try to avoid them, except for Epcot Friday nights and an occasional MK evening.


any earlier is just too early for a vacation.
Wait a second. Has it been announced, suggested or even rumored that the reduction in EMHs will result in allowing additional FPs? Not sure I understand the poll choices.
Wait a second. Has it been announced, suggested or even rumored that the reduction in EMHs will result in allowing additional FPs? Not sure I understand the poll choices.
No, it hasn't.