The PP meant you were dealing with a disgruntled employee, not that you were one, I'm sure (despite the way that was written)!
Glad you got it worked out.
They said, the ticket center has been calling several individuals and doing the same thing as some extra ap vouchers went out and they weren't sure who got the extras. IMHO that wasn't a very professional way to handle it.
IMHO that wasn't a very professional way to handle it.
I can understand why the manager responsible for the tickets canceled them (based on the info given).
You need to consider a handful of APs could easily reach into the tens of thousands of dollars (or more). As such, I would think APs are locked, logged, and inventoried regularly (like checks) to minimize theft. If someone from one busines unit (DVD) simply walked in and took a group of APs from another business unit (Theme Parks), then how could they know the tickets were not stolen?
If it was an employee that failed to do the correct paperwork transfering reponsibility for those tickets, then the manager had no way of knowing it unless the person fessed up. Based on this argument, I disagree with the idea that Disney should have simply let them remain active, and the actions taken, while inconvenient to the OP and other DVC members, were correct.
In the end, it seems the APs were eventually accounted for and the problem was quickly corrected with minimal loss or inconvenience.
- Chris
But anyways, I called quality assurance and just received a call back about 5 minutes ago, they are mailing me my new AP vouchers. It was a mistake on the ticket center end. They said, the ticket center has been calling several individuals and doing the same thing as some extra ap vouchers went out and they weren't sure who got the extras. IMHO that wasn't a very professional way to handle it.
I see your point, but how about a call saying "We are just verifying your eligibility, can you please fax me your contract page?" If the OP hadn't pursued it, he would have be improperly denied a very valuable incentive to which he was entitled, BUT told (without proper proof) that he was NOT. That's not fair, or professional.