I wish we lived in a society where teachers, doctors, nurses, firefighters and police workers, librarians, professors, child care workers and social workers were valued as much as these sports stars.
I wish that people who actually affect and help the lives of others were valued more than stars on a television.
It is a matter of economics. First there is supply and demand. There are a lot less people in the world who can hit .300, score 40 goals, or score a triple double then any of those things. And while those things are essentially unimportant (which I am in full agreement on) there are people willing to pay a lot of money to watch them do it, put their brand in view of the television cameras while they are doing it, and subscribe to sports packages to see them do it from their home or at bars.
If people were willing to pay $75 to sit in the bleachers and watch a teacher teach or social workers do their thing and there were channels dedicated to broadcasting their jobs that people were willing to pay premiums for and watched in high enough quantities to justify million dollar commercials they would make the same money.
In a free market these things are much more important that what we attach morally to a profession. It may not be right, but it how it works.
And there in lies the problem. The public is accepting of this kind of thing and even celebrate it.
It's sports. Not the end all and be all of life. Yet sports are treated as if they're everything important.
I agree with this. I said the exact same thing about the whole Tiger Woods affair and was flamed. He is paid a lot of money to golf and wear Nike clothing. He isn't paid a lot of money to be a model husband or father. There are athletes I care about in the capacity of their sport but the second they step off of the field or off the bike or whatever I don't care. I don't see a reason to extend our admiration for their ability to hit a ball, score a goal, peddle up a mountain, or anything else into their personal lives.
It is when we allow them to become life models as opposed to role models that it is a problem. In the role of golfer Tiger Woods is a role model. People should segregate that role from all the other rolls. He can be a roll model in a sport while not a role model in a marriage or a life model. It is up to parents to explain this difference to their kids. You can look up to an athlete for their athletic ability but that doesn't mean you emulate them in everything they do...that is just stupid.
As for the rest of what you said, see above, it is just economics.