I have a confession.... I LOVE FP+

[SmithSmith]

And I have since clarified that that was *not* what I meant. I'm sorry it came across that way.

Yes, I was lax with that wording, which is why I clarified. I was on my way to put my daughter down for a nap and trying to get the post off quickly. My mistake, for which I am sorry.

Thank you for the apology and further clarification because your original clarification came across as backtracking to me.

 

[MrInfinity]

Sorry, I've been out all day re-parking my car.

Did I miss anything?

I'm not sure. You may have. But I can't tell if I've missed anything, and I've been trying to follow along. From what I gather, someone is stalking someone, only we don't know who and whom, and whether it's actually stalking or not. There is a point in here somewhere, I know, and it surely relates to FP+. I think what we can conclude from this is that Figment 3.0 is exactly 80% better than Figment 1.0, and Figment 2.0 was somewhere along the quality of Captain EO. However, to figure this out I had to google something on the internet, which means that I'm stalking Figment, and... an expert... since I knew something about something, and looked for more info on it, and now post about it. I am still trying to figure out if when I google things I do so vigorously or complacently, because I'm sure it makes a difference in my experience at the parks, and with FP+. In the mean time, I placed my order for Dr.G's panty-unbunchers, and they have not yet arrived. It is after all, Valentines Day tomorrow, and they could make a good gift. Here honey, look what I got you...

 

[Candleshoe]

What movie was THIS from, eh?





Fargo?

 

[cakebaker]

Gone with the Wind- that's mammy!

 

[rajak73]

Sorry, I've been out all day re-parking my car.

Did I miss anything?

Well if you hadn't been out finding a drink at one of the millions and millions of places around Disney to buy booze, you could have kept up.. Nope, nothing you missed, just go back for the last 3 days on LT threads anWed same ole, same ole, although you will probably be accused of stalking then.
ETA: And we don't know the truth about the truth and whether it's true or not. It could be the truth but maybe not the truth but I think it depends on what your definition of is is about the truth.

 

[BugsDaddy]

I have been stalking myself. You wouldn't believe some of the crazy things I say.

 

[Angel Ariel]

Thank you for the apology and further clarification because your original clarification came across as backtracking to me.

I have absolutely no intent to ever personally attack anyone here. If it comes across that way, then I did something wrong and I will own that.

 

[Luckybee]

I have absolutely no intent to ever personally attack anyone here. If it comes across that way, then I did something wrong and I will own that.

And good for you doing that. There are far too many on these boards who don't when they should and they are often the ones who then complain when they perceive they were "wronged"

 

[Planogirl]

I could be wrong (planogirl, please say so if I am), but I don't think she was referring to simply following a thread you've subscribed to. I think she was more referencing searching/gathering posts from other threads that some were doing very vigorously the other day.
There does seem to be some personal issues at play between some posters, which are continually spilling over into whatever threads they join. It's certainly not everyone, but it is getting more and more frequent of late it seems.

You are right and thanks for trying to explain. It's amazing to see how difficult that can be.

I know I didn't post about general you on every instance where I used the word you after my one disclaimer...

But I didn't say you, specifically, were bothered.

General observation for anyone who feels they are observing alleged "stalking". Because in 10 years, I have seen that claim many times over.

I'm not bothered myself nor am I being stalked nor do I do any stalking. There are a few people that I believe have it in for a few others and tend to want to undercut them. I won't go into names because that is pointless. Stalking isn't a great word for that but this does tend to derail threads. My actual quote was "And there are some here that did seem to stalk the other thread" which is significantly different from stalking a person but of course I could be wrong.

I'm not sure. You may have. But I can't tell if I've missed anything, and I've been trying to follow along. From what I gather, someone is stalking someone, only we don't know who and whom, and whether it's actually stalking or not. There is a point in here somewhere, I know, and it surely relates to FP+. I think what we can conclude from this is that Figment 3.0 is exactly 80% better than Figment 1.0, and Figment 2.0 was somewhere along the quality of Captain EO. However, to figure this out I had to google something on the internet, which means that I'm stalking Figment, and... an expert... since I knew something about something, and looked for more info on it, and now post about it. I am still trying to figure out if when I google things I do so vigorously or complacently, because I'm sure it makes a difference in my experience at the parks, and with FP+. In the mean time, I placed my order for Dr.G's panty-unbunchers, and they have not yet arrived. It is after all, Valentines Day tomorrow, and they could make a good gift. Here honey, look what I got you...

Are you stalking Figment? Shame on you!

 

[Laketravis]

I have absolutely no intent to ever personally attack anyone here. If it comes across that way, then I did something wrong and I will own that.

Angel, I don't believe you owe anyone an apology. I'm on the road right now but as soon as I have the time to post all of the info I will.

.

 

[cakebaker]

Then I'm sorry. This (the bolded below) is the only reason I responded to that at all



Clearly in reading through the thread quickly, I missed something. I'm honestly sorry. There was *never* any intent on my part to make accusations, and I'm sorry that it came across that I was.

Well in all fairness, I wasn't as clear as I could be in that post.

Then I'm sorry. This (the bolded below) is the only reason I responded to that at all



Clearly in reading through the thread quickly, I missed something. I'm honestly sorry. There was *never* any intent on my part to make accusations, and I'm sorry that it came across that I was.

I didn't think you were making accusations, just that you thought I needed help in understanding what she was saying, no big deal. I do appreciate your apology. Thank you.

 

[SmithSmith]

Angel, I don't believe you owe anyone an apology. I'm on the road right now but as soon as I have the time to post all of the info I will.

.

Just to be clear. I was not asking for, nor expecting an apology. I just wanted clarification.

 

[Dr Gevil]

I want to apologize for not having an apology to give out. It's apparantly what all the cool kids are doing and I don't want to feel left out.