I get soooo mad when I read DISer’s bashing OUR president that I……

  • Thread starter Thread starter charlie,nj
  • Start date Start date
Originally posted by Peter Pirate
Oh no, Y2late, Clinton was fair game...He had...shhhh, oral sex in the Oval office and...shhhh, lied about it...No one got killed during these incidents and national security was never at risk but I heard Monica almost had her eye put out!:o
pirate:
:eek:

I must remember this one. :teeth:
 
Originally posted by year2late
I am also hoping y'all remember hundreds of Clinton bashing threads, He was OUR President, too. This nasty behaviour is by no means a liberal trait.

But I like to think we do it with so much more style and panache.:teeth:

Yep, what goes around comes around. Paybacks are a *****, aren't they?
 
Originally posted by crazyforgoofy
But I like to think we do it with so much more style and panache.

Sorry to break it to you, the liberals and conservatives both lack style and panche hen it comes to the nasty remarks. The only difference is that the conservatives seem to have the "neener neener neener" type retorts down to a science,
 

Originally posted by crazyforgoofy
But I like to think we do it with so much more style and panache.:teeth:

Yep, what goes around comes around. Paybacks are a *****, aren't they?


But when you only win the presidency 5 times in 52 years, the paybacks are definately few and far between
 
Originally posted by Peter Pirate
Oh no, Y2late, Clinton was fair game...He had...shhhh, oral sex in the Oval office and...shhhh, lied about it...No one got killed during these incidents and national security was never at risk but I heard Monica almost had her eye put out!:o
pirate:

National security was never at risk???? Are you serious? Tell that to those killed and injured in the first WTC bombing.

Why the hell did Clinton bomb Bagdhad if national security was never at risk? Why the hell did he bomb an empty aspirin factory in the hopes of getting OBL if national security was never at risk?
 
This, too


then_map_2.jpg


now_map_2.jpg


Note the implied coreleation.
 
I've been thinking about this and I'm taking a page out of the playbook of Republicans and how they "respected" OUR then president, Bill Clinton, when they were screaming for his impeachment.

I know my menopausal mind is a little weak on memory these days, but I'll never forget the bashing and the justification for doing so -- over relatively nothing. Well, this is something. Another 4 years of Bush, for me, is not "something to get over" and you can call it whining or bad sportsmanship or whatever you like, but remember: what I'm feeling is no different ( more logical, IMO) than what Republicans felt (still feel, some of them) about wanting Clinton out of the white house. Like someone said - this wasn't the Superbowl - this is serious and I am afraid for this country.

Call it bashing if you like, but I consider it speaking out for what I believe. And I'll be doing lots of it. Put down those cocktails, people - we need mental clarity to be watchful of what Bush trys to do these next 4 years.
 
Originally posted by auntpolly
I've been thinking about this and I'm taking a page out of the playbook of Republicans and how they "respected" OUR then president, Bill Clinton, when they were screaming for his impeachment.

I know my menopausal mind is a little weak on memory these days, but I'll never forget the bashing and the justification for doing so -- over relatively nothing. Well, this is something. Another 4 years of Bush, for me, is not "something to get over" and you can call it whining or bad sportsmanship or whatever you like, but remember: what I'm feeling is no different ( more logical, IMO) than what Republicans felt (still feel, some of them) about wanting Clinton out of the white house. Like someone said - this wasn't the Superbowl - this is serious and I am afraid for this country.

Call it bashing if you like, but I consider it speaking out for what I believe. And I'll be doing lots of it. Put down those cocktails, people - we need mental clarity to be watchful of what Bush trys to do these next 4 years.


Polly, my dear (I can't call you Aunt, I'm probably older than you) We are here, we are watching and we are pretty damned sober.

I figure the Bushies are gonna hear about as much from us as we heard from them, maybe more. There's a lot more at stake this time: The deaths of thousands and thousands; the destruction of the air and water; the skyrocketing budget.

They can call us anything they want. I'm not afraid of bullies.
 
Originally posted by auntpolly
I've been thinking about this and I'm taking a page out of the playbook of Republicans and how they "respected" OUR then president, Bill Clinton, when they were screaming for his impeachment.

I know my menopausal mind is a little weak on memory these days, but I'll never forget the bashing and the justification for doing so -- over relatively nothing. Well, this is something. Another 4 years of Bush, for me, is not "something to get over" and you can call it whining or bad sportsmanship or whatever you like, but remember: what I'm feeling is no different ( more logical, IMO) than what Republicans felt (still feel, some of them) about wanting Clinton out of the white house. Like someone said - this wasn't the Superbowl - this is serious and I am afraid for this country.

Call it bashing if you like, but I consider it speaking out for what I believe. And I'll be doing lots of it. Put down those cocktails, people - we need mental clarity to be watchful of what Bush trys to do these next 4 years.

I never felt call to do a "hear, hear", but this deserves it.

The bottom line is that as long as I voted, I feel I have every right to express my opinion. Call it what you want, I call it my right as an American.
 
Originally posted by dmadman43
This, too


then_map_2.jpg


now_map_2.jpg


Note the implied coreleation.

Ok explain your idea of the correlation. I may be missing something but I see that the "slave states" and the "territories open to slavery" went red and the 'Free States" went blue. Do you mean you think the south is gonna rise again?'
 
Originally posted by crazyforgoofy
Ok explain your idea of the correlation. I may be missing something but I see that the "slave states" and the "territories open to slavery" went red and the 'Free States" went blue. Do you mean you think the south is gonna rise again?'

Maybe deadman is making a correlation between today's Conservative Republicans and yesterday's Confederacy? Or maybe he is advocating repeal of the 13th and 14th amendments?
 
Originally posted by gometros
Maybe deadman is making a correlation between today's Conservative Republicans and yesterday's Confederacy? Or maybe he is advocating repeal of the 13th and 14th amendments?

Hmmmmm.....that one went right over my head (menopause, you know).......what <i>is</i> he getting at?
 
Originally posted by crazyforgoofy
Ok explain your idea of the correlation. I may be missing something but I see that the "slave states" and the "territories open to slavery" went red and the 'Free States" went blue. Do you mean you think the south is gonna rise again?'

The implication is that it is the backward thinking, unenlighted, hayseed, cousin-marrying, abortion-hatin', gun totin', hicks that voted for Bush. Only the enlighted voted for Kerry.
 
Originally posted by gometros
Maybe deadman is making a correlation between today's Conservative Republicans and yesterday's Confederacy? Or maybe he is advocating repeal of the 13th and 14th amendments?

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that the deliberate mistyping of my screenname was purely accidental and unintentional, as I would never expect an enlighted, open minded liberal to resort to namecalling.

Jump to conclusions much? I'm not advocating anything. I had no idea the obvious correlation would be lost on Kerry supporters. I would have thought they would have jumped all over this obvious implication.
 
Originally posted by dmadman43
The implication is that it is the backward thinking, unenlighted, hayseed, cousin-marrying, abortion-hatin', gun totin', hicks that voted for Bush. Only the enlighted voted for Kerry.

I am sorry you thought that was implied

Each side feel free to use your own punctuation.
 
Originally posted by dmadman43
The implication is that it is the backward thinking, unenlighted, hayseed, cousin-marrying, abortion-hatin', gun totin', hicks that voted for Bush. Only the enlighted voted for Kerry.

Wow, I didn't know you felt that way! But since you posted it I began to think about the information. Thanks.
 
Originally posted by dmadman43
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that the deliberate mistyping of my screenname was purely accidental and unintentional, as I would never expect an enlighted, open minded liberal to resort to namecalling.

It honestly was. There are some screennames I see on DIS that I misreading because they loo so close to what I think I'm seeing. Somehow I miss the 'm' in 'dmadman'

And, btw, I'm not a liberal. You know, the opposite of Republican is not liberal, it's Democrat. Believe it or not you can sepaate Liberal from Democrat and they can stand on their own.
 
Originally posted by dmadman43
The implication is that it is the backward thinking, unenlighted, hayseed, cousin-marrying, abortion-hatin', gun totin', hicks that voted for Bush. Only the enlighted voted for Kerry.

That about sums it up to me! Around here they're called Rednecks. And you don't have to live in the south to be one. What kills me is how many times I've heard one talk about why they support Bush. "Kerry wants to take guns away and keep us from huntin'!" Uhh...Kerry supported banning assault weapons. Since when do you need an oozie to kill a deer or a squirrel?
"Well, Kerry likes abortion." Kerry never said he was FOR abortion he said he believes that it's the woman's decision, not the governments and outlawing them isn't going to stop them. God help us all with W in the White House for the next 4 years. Pretty soon we're going to have North Korea and many other countries on our butts and it will make the Iraq war look minor. I hope it doesn't happen but with this administration it wouldn't surprise me.
 












Save Up to 30% on Rooms at Walt Disney World!

Save up to 30% on rooms at select Disney Resorts Collection hotels when you stay 5 consecutive nights or longer in late summer and early fall. Plus, enjoy other savings for shorter stays.This offer is valid for stays most nights from August 1 to October 11, 2025.
CLICK HERE







New Posts







DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest

Back
Top