footballmouse
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2008
- Messages
- 3,023
I have 3, ages 23, 25, and 30. I would definitely have 3 again and actually I would have liked to have had 4. Looking back, I would have had one in the 5 year gap.
Lol my daughter who is our only child makes this joke as well. My husband and I originally talked about having one and adopting one, but I didn't have my daughter until I was 30, and she was not an easy baby. By the time she grew into an easier to manage pre-schooler, we were nearing 35 and just didn't know if we had the energy to add another to the family. We also really liked the idea of having only one as we knew we would be able to do what we wanted to do for her financially. She made it easier on us as she liked being an only child and never asked for siblings like some kids do. And as someone mentioned earlier, I didn't worry so much about giving her siblings as I know there's no guarantee they will be close. But I do, as stated earlier, worry all the time about her having to manage aging parents alone. It has been a priority for me to save as much money as possible so she will hopefully never be responsible for us financially, but the emotional toll is another thing entirely. She does not intend to have children, and I don't think she'll change her mind about that, so likely there will be no grandchildren for us. But I absolutely adore my daughter and am so grateful for our close relationship.as my grandson says, "Once you have achieved perfection what is the sense of trying again."
My daughter was in the NICU at UCSF for 2 months. I stayed nearby at a Ronald McDonald House. After NICU she was transfered to our local hospital, she just needed to gain weight. When she went back to our local hospital where she was born, and on the day she was discharged, the nurse that was there when she was born discharged her. She told me that she didn't think my daughter was going to make it, that when they were "bagging" her she just wasn't responding but then all of the sudden took a breath. She came home mid July weighing 4 pounds. All her milestones were delayed, especially speech. Had speech therapy for many years. Her eyes have been checked during hospitalization and every year since. She does wear glasses for far-sightedness but that's it. She just turned 19 and graduated HS with honors and is off to college this summer to become an engineer. Very smart girl! I'm so happy to hear how well your son has done.
I have 3 40, 35, & 23 last one was a huge but wonderful surprise! Yes I would do it all again my husband passed when youngest was just 2 and the older ones were teens it was hard but they also kept me going.
I’m another proud parent of one (DS 26), and feel blessed to have him. Would have loved at least one more, maybe two or three more, but it wasn’t to be, due to fertility and other issues out of our control. My five siblings and I (now in our 50’s and 60’s) were and still are all close, but every family is different. There are no guarantees in life.
Several friends with 3 or more kids have told me that the biggest adjustment was going from 2 to 3, when the kids outnumbered the parents. Most have no regrets and feel it gets easier over time. IMO, it’s a very personal decision with many factors involved.
I have 5 and going from 1 to 2 was my hardest. I was a SAHM with a very easy 20 month old, not knowing she was a very easy baby, assumed it was my excellent parenting. Apparently that was not the case, #2 was a cranky baby, opposite of #1, and I had a hard time not being able to be one on one. #3 was my easiest, #4 and #5 hard only because of the twin factor, and #3 wasn’t 2 yet.Yep, when you go from 2 kids to 3 kids you have to change from man-to-man to a zone defense. Adding #4 & #5 was far easier.
I always say, the first one lulls you into complacency--this isn't so hard! I don't know what those other mothers are complaining about! Then you get #2, and WHAMMO!I have 5 and going from 1 to 2 was my hardest. I was a SAHM with a very easy 20 month old, not knowing she was a very easy baby, assumed it was my excellent parenting. Apparently that was not the case, #2 was a cranky baby, opposite of #1, and I had a hard time not being able to be one on one. #3 was my easiest, #4 and #5 hard only because of the twin factor, and #3 wasn’t 2 yet.
I was lucky. #1 was my difficult baby (probably somewhat due to my inexperience). He didn't sleep well, had digestive issues, and a few other minor (normal) infant problems. #2 was a dream come true. He ate well, slept well, and had a very happy personality (until he hit 2 years old and started throwing major tantrums). For the record, #3 & #4 were very good babies as well but were 18 mos apart, so they kept me very busy (but I actually loved having them that close in age and wished my older 2 were like that as well). Baby #5....she was an amazing infant. Then she turned 1 and decided she wasn't sleeping more than 2-3 hours at a time *ever* and was already 100% into the typical 2 year old behavior a year ahead of time (we found out later that she is/was really smart and inquisitive and just couldn't stop her brain from being in hyper drive mode. She's still like that nearly 20 years later but now knows how to calm herself down.). I spent sooooo many nights snuggling on the couch with her and watching Ice Road Truckers (the only non-infomercial TV show on during the night at that point in time) or a Baby Einstein DVD. I would have killed for 5 hours of uninterrupted sleep at that point in my life but I would never want to give up those one-on-one middle-of-the-night snuggles with that baby. I know I'm crazy, but I treasure all of those middle of the night feedings with *all* of my kids -- there's nothing like rocking your baby in a dark, quiet room while everyone else is sleeping. Total bliss.I always say, the first one lulls you into complacency--this isn't so hard! I don't know what those other mothers are complaining about! Then you get #2, and WHAMMO!