Pixiedust34
<font color=blue>It's like I'm stuck in a music ti
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2005
- Messages
- 9,649
I forgot all about it! We had TV and radios off, so no alert for us.

Was this a nation wide broadcast? And what was it for?
This was a nationwide broadcast to test the ability of the federal government to communicate to the majority of people. This has never been tested before. The tests that HAVE been done have been on a state or local level, never nationwide.Was this a nation wide broadcast? And what was it for?
We don't have cable, or listen to the radio, so unless someone hadn't mentioned it on facebook I wouldn't have even known about it. I know a lot of people that are unplugged from the media too, I guess we're screwed in an actual emergency.![]()
This was a nationwide broadcast to test the ability of the federal government to communicate to the majority of people. This has never been tested before. The tests that HAVE been done have been on a state or local level, never nationwide.
I think there's a couple different ways you can look at this...I don't think they communicated very well.
I think there's a couple different ways you can look at this...
1) The test was, if not a total failure, at least a C-. This means things need to be worked on/fixed if this needs to be a viable option (remember, the EAS system has NEVER been used Nationwide... even on 9/11). Another test should be done in 3-6 months to see if things have been corrected.
It worked on my local station, but they are a 50,000 watt station that is some sort of priority thing that will broadcast no matter what (supposedly)
2) Is this a nail in the coffin for the EAS system itself? Has anyone relied on the EAS system (a local one) to alert them for "pending doom" (storm, whatever)?
I thought the 'net was actually so researchers at different colleges could communicate with each other.I am surprised that there wasn't something over the world wide web, aka, internet. Wasn't that was it was "invented" for in the first place, a place for communications in the event of an nuclear attack?
Sam, yes, we do pay attention to the EBS for storms--not so much quick run to the basement but more pay attention something might be happening here....
I thought the 'net was actually so researchers at different colleges could communicate with each other.
Around here, the local broadcasters (at least TV) do their own announcements... they don't run the EAS. But since every broadcaster runs EAS tests weekly & monthly, it does seem strange that this was so problematic.
for over 6 mins...and then the channel went back to what I orginally had on.I tried to record it after it started, and it wouldn't work. I wanted to do it to play it back for my DH, because it was sort of funny...there was a lot of static (like some foreign radio broadcast during WWI or something), and I could hear people talking. I can't even remember what they were saying, but it sounded like arguing, like on a political news show, if that makes sense.I did hear Obama's name. This was on TruTV.

Then the announcement came on that it was only a test and I was like,
but relieved.I am surprised that there wasn't something over the world wide web, aka, internet. Wasn't that was it was "invented" for in the first place, a place for communications in the event of an nuclear attack?
Sam, yes, we do pay attention to the EBS for storms--not so much quick run to the basement but more pay attention something might be happening here....
I was in Vermont during Hurricaine Irene, and the local radio stations there all used the EAS during the major flooding to alert us about what was happening. So I do think that it can be effective, and yes, I felt like I was alerted about the impending doom. The reverse 911 system also worked at that time. I was actually quite impressed with the reverse 911, I had never seen it work (even for a test) in the past.
except in 1976 we had power LOL! 