pequele said:
I have no idea how you can read "anger" when I asked originally why the person took a fast pass if she couldn't use it,
I didn't say anger connected to that post, I said critical - basing that on the emphasis on the words "take" and "tell" in the context of the post. Try saying it out loud, stressing rose words, and see how it sounds.
pequele said:
And my
ECV posts started off posing questions to the person who mentioned segregation earlier on as I was "skeptical" about how it is not segregation when they get separate parking
As the family member of someone to whom a handicap parking placard has been granted, you should reasonably be expected to know (again) that the entire purpose of handicap parking is to get the person out of the flow of traffic as quickly and safely as possible; that the vast majority of people who meet the eligibility for this parking don't use
ECVs; that it's not a perk; that there are strict criteria for eligibility (and that generally, people would prefer to be healthy). You also must know that there's no sticker that qualifies anyone to park legally in a handicap space.
Handicap parking spaces are mandated / governed by laws - things like who can use them, number in relation to the overall number of spaces, size, fines... Some mass transit operations offer a paratransit
option for passengers with special needs. Option, not mandatory. It's expensive to use and to operate, and the service isn't always the greatest. There's no need for Walt Disney World to provide separate transportation to guests on wheels. The buses and monorails, and most boats, are very accommodating.
The "anger" comment refers to most of today's posts. It seemed a waste of bandwidth to quote them all, bu go back and try reading what you've posted today, impartially.